فراتحلیل اثر کم‌خاک‌ورزی و بی‌خاک‌ورزی بر عملکرد ذرت در ایران

حیدری, احمد; عباسی, سعید

doi:10.22034/jam.2026.70772.1350

فراتحلیل اثر کم‌خاک‌ورزی و بی‌خاک‌ورزی بر عملکرد ذرت در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

بخش تحقیقات فنی و مهندسی کشاورزی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان همدان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی،

10.22034/jam.2026.70772.1350

چکیده

اثر روشهای مختلف خاکورزی بر عملکرد ذرت در مطالعات متعددی بررسی شده است. بیشتر مطالعات انجام شده فقط یک محدوده کوچک ( آزمایشهای مزرعهای در یک منطقه) را پوشش میدهند که بعضاً دارای نتایج ضد و نقیض میباشند. هدف از این تحقیق، فراتحلیل اثر خاکورزی حفاظتی (کمخاکورزی و بیخاکورزی) بر عملکرد ذرت (دانهای و علوفهای) با استفاده از مطالعات انجام شده در ایران است. بدینمنظور مقالهها، گزارشهای پژوهشی و پایاننامههای دانشجویی در فاصلۀ زمانی 1370 تا 1404 با استفاده از واژههای کلیدی مرتبط با خاکورزی در محصول ذرت مرور شد. پس از کنترل کیفی، 17 مطالعه برای مقایسۀ کمخاکورزی با خاکورزی رایج و 14 مطالعه برای مقایسه روش بیخاکورزی با خاکورزی رایج با استفاده از مدل تصادفی وارد فرایند فراتحلیل شدند. بر اساس نتایج بهدست آمده، با توجه به مقدار اندازه اثر کُل (57/0+=SMD) و فاصله اطمینان 95 درصد (92/0 ، 21/0) در روش کمخاکورزی میتوان نتیجه گرفت که روش کمخاکورزی در مقایسه با روش خاکورزی رایج باعث افزایش معنیدار عملکرد ذرت شده است. کمخاکورزی نسبت به خاکورزی رایج عملکرد ذرت دانهای و علوفهای را به ترتیب 41/6 و 80/4 درصد افزایش داد. همچنین با توجه به مقدار اندازه اثر کُل (88/0- =SMD) و فاصله اطمینان 95 درصد (12/0- ، 65/1-) در روش بیخاکورزی میتوان نتیجه گرفت که روش بیخاکورزی در مقایسه با روش خاکورزی رایج باعث کاهش معنیدار عملکرد ذرت شده است. بیخاکورزی نسبت به خاکورزی رایج عملکرد ذرت دانهای و عملکرد ذرت علوفهای را به ترتیب 55/8 و 51/5 درصد کاهش داد. استفاده از روش کمخاکورزی و بیخاکورزی در زراعت ذرت نیاز به تحقیقات بیشتر و درازمدت دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

کشاورزی حفاظتی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Minimum Tillage and No-Tillage on Corn Yield in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

Ahmad Heidari
Saeed Abbasi

Department of Agricultural Engineering Research, Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension organization (AREEO), Hamadan, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The effects of different tillage methods on corn yield have been investigated in several studies. However, most of these studies cover only small geographical areas (field experiments in one region) and sometimes yield contradictory and incomplete results. The present study aims to investigate the effect of conservation tillage (minimum tillage and no- tillage) on corn yield (grain and silage) by synthesizing national research and applying the meta-analysis method. For this purpose, articles, research reports and graduate theses were reviewed between 1991 and 2025 using keywords related to tillage in corn production. After quality control, 17 studies comparing reduced tillage with conventional tillage and 14 studies comparing no tillage with conventional tillage were included in the meta-analysis using a random effects model. Based on the results obtained, the overall effect size for reduced tillage (SMD=+0.57), it can be concluded that this method increased corn yield compared to conventional tillage. minimum tillage increased grain and silage yields by 6.41 and 4.80 percent, respectively, compared to conventional tillage. Conversely, considering the effect size for no-tillage (SMD=-0.88), it can be concluded that this method reduced corn yield compared to conventional tillage. No-tillage decreased grain and silage yields by 8.55 and 5.51 percent, respectively, compared to conventional tillage. The use of minimum tillage and no-tillage method in corn cultivation requires further and long-term research.
Introduction
The continuous use of conventional tillage (plowing with a moldboard plow) in agricultural fields has led to increased soil erosion and reduced soil fertility. Soil erosion is a major environmental problem in Iran. The country’s annual erosion rate is estimated at 895 million tonnes (equivalent to 5.5 tonnes per hectare per year), while the global average annual rate is 2.2 tonnes per hectare. Soil erosion affects soil quality and crop yield. In conventional farming systems (commonly used in Iran), the effects of erosion on yield are directly related to the reduction in the amount of water that can be stored in the soil and made available by plants. To overcome this problem, conservation agriculture, which includes: (1) no or minimal soil manipulation, (2) permanent soil cover with plant residues, and (3) plant diversity and adherence to crop rotation principles, is recommended. The effectiveness of conservation agriculture in controlling runoff and soil erosion has been proven, and it is expected to ultimately have a positive effect on crop yield. The effect of different tillage methods on corn yield under Iranian conditions has been investigated in several studies. However, most of these studies cover only limited areas (field experiments in one region), which sometimes have contradictory and incomplete results. The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of conservation tillage (minimum tillage and no- tillage) on corn yield by synthesizing national studies with meta-analysis method.

Materials and Methods
This research aims to investigate the effect of minimum tillage and no-tillage on yield of corn using national studies and research and applying the meta-analysis method. For this purpose, articles, research reports and graduate theses between 1991 and 2025 were reviewed using keywords related to tillage in corn. Finally, after quality control, 17 studies were selected to compare minimum tillage method with conventional tillage and 14 studies were selected to compare no-tillage with conventional tillage using a random effects model. The data required for meta-analysis are the treatment mean ( standard deviation ), and the number of replicates or sample size (n) in the experimental design. In data analysis, the standardized mean difference parameter, which is a key measure of effect size, was used between the control treatment (conventional tillage) and the experiment (conservation tillage).
Results and Discussion
Based on the results obtained, the effect size for the minimum tillage method (SMD=+0.57) indicates that the minimum tillage method has increased corn yield compared to conventional tillage. Minimum tillage increased grain yield by 6.41 % compared to conventional tillage. The average total yield of grain corn in conventional tillage and minimum tillage methods was 8244.6 and 8871.9 kg/ha, respectively. After weighting each yield, the average weighted yield of conventional tillage and minimum tillage methods was 740.3 and 787.7, respectively. Also, minimum tillage increased the yield of silage corn by 4.80% compared to conventional tillage. The average total yield of forage corn in the conventional tillage and minimum tillage methods is 51822.6 and 55940.6 kg/ha, respectively. After weighting each yield, the average weighted yield of the conventional tillage and minimum tillage methods was 7748.7 and 8120.8, respectively. The probability values in the Begg and Egger method (for estimating publication bias) were 0.002 and 0.037, respectively (less than 10 percent), which allows us to conclude that there is evidence of publication bias in studies comparing the minimum tillage method with conventional tillage in corn production. Considering the effect size of the no-till method (SMD = -0.88), it can be concluded that the no-till method has reduced corn yield compared to the conventional tillage method. No-till reduced the yield of grain corn by 8.55% compared to conventional tillage. The average total yield of grain corn in the conventional tillage and no-till methods is 8903.3 and 7980.2 kg/ha, respectively. After weighting to each of the yields, the average weighted yield of the conventional tillage and no-till methods was 1116.5 and 1021.0, respectively. Also, no-till reduced the yield of silage corn by 5.51% compared to conventional tillage. The average total yield of silage corn in the conventional tillage and no-tillage methods is 56449.3 and 53205.2 kg/ha, respectively. After weighting each yield, the average weighted yield of the conventional tillage and no-tillage methods was 9421.5 and 8902.5, respectively. The probability values in the Begg and Egger method (for estimating publication bias) were 0.09 and 0.055, respectively (less than 10 percent), which allows us to conclude that there is evidence of publication bias in studies comparing no-till with conventional tillage in corn production.
Conclusion
The minimum tillage method increased the yield of grain corn (6.41%) and silage corn (4.80%) compared to the conventional tillage method, whereas the no-tillage method decreased the yield of grain corn (-8.55%) and silage corn (-5.51%). The use of minimum tillage and no-till methods in corn farming requires further and long-term research.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Chisel Plow
Conservation Tillage
Direct Drilling
Moldboard Plow

مراجع

Abeyasekera, S, Ritchie, J.M., and Lawson-McDowall, J. (2002). Combining ranks and scores to determine farmers’ preferences for bean varieties in southern Malawi. Experimental Agriculture, 38(1):97-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0014479702000182.

Afzalinia, S., Dehghanian, S. I., Alijani, Kh., Mohammadi, D., Hosseini S. M., Estakhr, A., Alavimanesh., S. M. and Zare, M. (2023). Effect of permanent raised bed planting, no-till, and conventional tillage methods on yield and water productivity in wheat-forage corn rotation. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research. 24(88):33-50. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22092/amsr.2024.364325.1472.

Afzalinia, S., and Karami, A. (2018). Effect of Conservation tillage on soil properties and corn yield in the corn- wheat rotation. Journal of Iran Biosystem Engineering.49(1):129-137.(In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2017.243058.664995.

Arabkhedri, M., Shadfar, S., Jafari-Ardakani, A., Bayat, R., Khajavi, E., and Madian, M. H. (2018). Improving water erosion estimates for Iran. Journal of Watershed Management Research. 31(3): 13-27. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22092/wmej.2018.121424.1106.

Asadi, M. E., Fizbakhsh, M. T., and Razzaghi, M. H. (2016). Study of silage maize yield and yield components under different managements of tillage. Journal of Water and Soil Conversation. 23(3): 151-170. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22069/jwfst.2016.3191.

Azizi, F., Mahrokh1,A., Ghotbi, V., Golzardi, F., Mofidian, S. M. A., Zamanian, M, Rahjoo, V., Torabi3.,M., and Elias Soltani, E. (2022). Meta-Analysis of Some Agronomic Factors Affected on Decreasing Forage Maize Yield in Iran. Journal of Crops Improvement.24(3):793-805.(In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2021.326061.2570.

Bakker, M. M., Govers, G., Jones, R. A., and Rounsevell, M. D. A. (2007). The effect of soil erosion on Europe’s crop yields. Ecosystems. 10: 1209–1219.

Barton, A. P., Fullen, M. A, Mitchell, D. J, Hocking, T. J, Liu, L., Bo, Z.W., Zheng, Y., and Xia, Z. Y. (2004). Effects of soil conservation measures on soil erosion rates and crop productivity on subtropical Ultisols in Yinnan Province. China Agricultural EcosystemEnvironmental,104:343–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.034.

Begg, C. B., and Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50, 1088–1101.

Borenstein, M.Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., and Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-analysis. Wiley,London. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587.

Cooper, J., Lombardi, R., Boardman, D., and Carliell-Marquet, C. (2011). The future distribution and production of global phosphate rock reserves. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 57: 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.09.009.

Dumanski, J., Peiretti, R., Benetis, J., McGarry, D., and Pieri, C. (2006). The paradigm of conservation tillage. Proceedings of World Association of Soil and Water Conservation, FAO, Rome, 58–64.

Egger, M., Smith, G. D., and Phillips, A. N. (1997). Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ, 315(7121):1533–1537. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7121.1533.

FAO. 2012. FAOSTAT, Statistical databases and data sets of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx (Accessed on April 2012).

FAO. 2022. http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/.

Fathi, A., Barari Tari., D., Fallah, H., and Niknezhad, Y.(2018). Effect of tillage systems and fertilization (NPK) on quantitative and qualitative traits of corn (Zea mays L.). Journal of Plant Ecophysiology. 12(44): 102-115. (In Persian)

Gates S. (2002). Review of methodology of quantitative reviews using. meta-analysis in ecology. Journal of AnimalEcology.71(4):547-557. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00634.x.

Ghanbaryan Alavijeh, H. R., Ahmadi Chenarbon, H., and Zand, B. (2014). Effect of different tillage methods on soil physical properties, and yield of two forage maize cultivars in Varamin Province. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization. 1(2): 89-96. (In Persian)

Ghasemi1, A., Ghanbari, A., Fakheri, B.A,. and Fanaie, H.R. (2016). Effect of different fertilizer resources on yield and yield components of grain maize (Zea mays L.) influenced by tillage managements. Journal of Agroecology. 7(4): 499-512. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v7i4.43938.

Ghaseminejad Raeini, M., Sheikh Davoodi, M., Almasi, M., Bahrami, H., Zand, E., and Alamiisaeid, K. (2014). Effect of tillage, fertilization and weed control methods on corn yield in the Northern part Khuzestan. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 36 (2): 1-16. (In Persian)

Giller, K.E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M., and Tittonell, P. (2009). Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics’ view. Field Crop Research.114:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017.

Haddadi, M. H., and Mohseni, M. (2015). Comparison of different tillge systems effect on forage silage yield of corn. Journal of Research Findings in Improving Crop Production. 1(1): 55-66. (In Persian)

Hamzei, J., and Borbor, A. (2014). Effect of different soil tillage methods and cover crops on yield and yield components of corn and some soil characteristics. Journal of Sustainable Agricultural and Production Science. 27(3): 35-47. (In Persian)

Hasanzadeh Moghadam, H., Muhammad Galavi, M., Ramroudi, M., and Sharifi, H. R. (2017). Influence of tillage method and residue retention on yield and some agronomic characteristics of forage maize in water stress conditions. Journal of Sustainable Agricultural and Production Science. 27(4): 137-151. (In Persian)

Heidari, A. (2022). Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Subsoilinge on Potato Yield. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research. 23(80), 71-86. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22092/amsr.2022.360309.1428.

Heidari, A. (2023). Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Conservation tillage on irrigated wheat yield in Iran. Jornal of Researches in Mechanics of Agricultural. 11(4),105-115.(InPersian). http://doi.org/10.22034/JRMAM.2022.13885.589.

Heidari, A. (2025). Meta-analysis of the effect of subsoiling on the yield of wheat, sugar beet, corn and cotton in Iran. Journal of Research in Mechanics of Agricultural Machinery.14(2): 1-16. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/JRMAM.2025.14975.728.

Heidari, A., Bahramloo, R., and Bakhtiyari, M. R. (2022). Meta-analysis of the effect of conservation tillage on potato yield. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization. 7 (2), 19–30. (In Persian). https://doi.org/ 10.22034/JAM.2022.15716.

Heidari, A., Haji Agha Alizadeh, H., Yazdanpanah., A. R., and Amiri Parian, J. (2017). The effect of different tillage methods and fertilizer application on soil physical properties and c orn yield. Journal of Water and Soil Science. 20(78):103-112. (In Persian). http://dx.doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jstnar.20.78.103.

Higgins, J. P., and Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons, 4,570.

Hilshey, B., Bench, C., and Tessieri, L. (2020). A practical guide to no-till and cover crops in the Mid-tlantic. https://projects.sare.org/wp-content/uploads/No-till-and-Cover-Crop-Implimenation-Third-Edition-online.pdf

Khaliliaqdam, N., Hasani, R., and Mir-Mahmoodian, T. (2018). Meta-analysis of some effective factors on wheat production in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Crops Production, 20(1): 191-204. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2017.60475.

Knowler, D., and Bradshaw, B. 2007. Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy, 32:25–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.01.003.

Mohammad Ghazinejad, M., Monjezi, N., Rahnama Ghahfarokhi, A.,& Sheikhdavoodi, M. J.(2022). Effect of tillage method and wheat residues on physical productivity of water and corn yield in Dezful city. Journal of Sustainable Agricultural and Production Science. 32(1): 17-33. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/saps.2021.43900.2604.

Mohammadi, K. h., Nabi Allahi, K., Aghaalikhani, M., and Khoramali, F. (2009). Study on the effect of different tillage methods on the soil physical properties, yield and yield components of rainfed wheat. Journal of Plant Production, 16(4): 77-91. (In Persian). https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23222050.1388.16.4.5.6.

Mohseni, M., and Haddadi, M. H. (2016). Evaluation of different tillage systems and plant densities effects on silage corn yield after wheat harvesting. Journal of Research Achievement for Improvement Crop Production. 2(2): 1-20. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11473.

Nael, M., Salehi, S.S., Hamzei, J., and Zandi Baghche-Maryam, M. (2023). Three-year effects of conservation tillage and cover crop on selected soil quality indicators and corn yield components. Journal of Water and Soil. 36(6):773-785. https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.2022.78321.1195.

Nisi, A., Parsaeian, M., Gholami, A., Baradaran Firooz-Abadi, M., and Hamid Abbasdokht, H. (2017). The effect of tillage management, salicylic acid and mycorrhizal fungi on soil respiration, and some growth characteristics of maize. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science.48(3):889-900. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijfcs.2018.239089.654362.

Noble, J. H. (2006). Meta-analysis: Methods, strengths, weaknesses, and political uses. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine,147(1): 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lab.2005.08.006.

Nunes, M. R, Karlen, D. L., and Moorman, T. B. (2020). Tillage intensity effects on soil structure indicators - A US meta-analysis. Sustainability, 12(5): 2071. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052071.

Nunes, M. R, Karlen, D. L., Veum, K. S., Moorman, T. B., and Cambardella, C. A. (2020). Biological soil health indicators respond to tillage intensity: A US meta-analysis. Geoderma.369,114335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114335.

Pittelkow, C. M., Linquist, B. A., Lundy, M. E., Liang, X., Van Groenigen, K. J., Lee, J., and Van Kessel, C. (2015). When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis. Field crops research,183, 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.020.

Ried, K. (2006). Interpreting and understanding meta-analysis graphs: A practical guide. Australian family physician, 35(8).

Rothstein, H., Sutton, R., Alexander J., and Borenstein, M., (2005). Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Scopel, E., Silva, F.A.M.D., Corbeels, M., Affholder, F., and Maraux, F. (2004). Modelling crop residue mulching effects on water use and production of maize under semi-arid and humid tropical conditions, Agronomie. 24:383–395.

Shahraki, F. A. (2009). Effects of tillage methods and wheat residue management on corn yield and some soil properties. Final report. Agricultural Engineering Research Institute. (In Persian)

Soltani, E., and Soltani, A. (2014). Necessity of using meta-analysis in field crops researches. Journal of Crop Production. 7(3): 203-216. (In Persian)

Van den Putte, A., Govers, G., Diels, J., Gillijns, K., and Demuzere, M. (2010). Assessing the effect of soil tillage on crop growth: A meta-regression analysis on European crop yields under conservation agriculture. European journal of agronomy.33(3):231-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.05.008.

Von Braun, J., Byerlee, D., Chartres, C., Lumpkin, T., Olembo, N., and Waage, J. 2010. A draft strategy and results framework for the CGIAR. 20 March 2010. CGIAR, the World Bank, Washington D.C.

Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhou, S., and Wang, Z. (2018). Meta-analysis of no-tillage effect on wheat and maize water use efficiency in China. Science of the Total Environment, 635, 1372-1382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.202.

Zeidali, E., Moradi, M., & Fathi, A. (2022). Quantitative and qualitative response of corn yield as influenced by tillage methods and nitrogen consumption. Journal of Applied Field Crops Research. 35(2):85-105. https://doi.org/10.22092/aj.2023.354173.1542.