بهینه‌سازی، تحلیل حساسیت و ارزیابی پتانسیل گرمایش جهانی سامانه تولید کلزا در شهرستان مهران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم- دانشکده کشاورزی - دانشگاه ایلام - ایلام – ایران.

2 گروه اقتصاد- دانشکده علوم انسانی - دانشگاه ایلام - ایلام – ایران.

10.22034/jam.2026.72153.1361

چکیده

استفاده مؤثر و کارآمد از انرژی در سامانه‌های تولید محصولات کشاورزی یکی از ارکان اساسی دستیابی به کشاورزی پایدار و کاهش پیامدهای زیست‌محیطی محسوب می‌شود. هدف از این پژوهش، تحلیل مصرف انرژی، تحلیل حساسیت، بهینه‌سازی نهاده‌ها و بررسی آلایندگی‌های زیست‌محیطی سامانه تولید کلزا در شهرستان مهران بود. داده‌های مورد نیاز از طریق تکمیل پرسش‌نامه و مصاحبه حضوری با کشاورزان منطقه جمع‌آوری شد و مقادیر نهاده‌ها و ستانده‌ها به معادل انرژی تبدیل گردید. شاخص‌های انرژی شامل کارایی، بهره‌وری، شدت و انرژی خالص محاسبه شد، نتایج نشان داد کارایی و بهره‌وری انرژی به ترتیب برابر با 09/1 و 04/0 کیلوگرم بر مگاژول است. نتایج تحلیل حساسیت با استفاده از تابع تولید کاب–داگلاس نشان داد نهاده‌های ماشین‌آلات، سوخت دیزل، کود فسفر، آب آبیاری، سموم شیمیایی و بذر بر عملکرد محصول تأثیر مثبت و نهاده‌های نیروی انسانی، کود نیتروژن و الکتریسیته تأثیر منفی دارند. نتایج تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها (DEA)  در شرایط بازگشت به مقیاس ثابت و متغیر نشان داد میانگین کارایی فنی، کارایی فنی خالص و کارایی مقیاس به ترتیب 45/87، 23/96 و 75/90 درصد است که بیانگر وجود ناکارایی فنی و مقیاس در بخش قابل توجهی از مزارع می‌باشد. همچنین مصرف نهاده­های سوخت دیزل با 24/1605 مگاژول در هکتار بیشترین و کود فسفر با 11/13 مگاژول در هکتار کمترین میزان مازاد مصرف را جهت بهینه‌سازی نهاده‌ها به خود اختصاص داده‌اند. بررسی انتشار گازهای گلخانه‌ای نشان داد مصرف الکتریسیته و سوخت دیزل به ترتیب در شرایط مرسوم 21/4749 و 16/706 کیلوگرم معادل دی‌اکسیدکربن در هکتار بوده که پس از بهینه‌سازی مصرف نهاده‌ها این مقادیر به ترتیب به 44/4392 و 25/588 کیلوگرم معادل دی‌اکسیدکربن در هکتار کاهش یافت. نتایج نشان می‌دهد بهینه‌سازی مصرف نهاده‌ها علاوه بر بهبود کارایی انرژی و اقتصادی، نقش مؤثری در کاهش آلایندگی‌های زیست‌محیطی و پتانسیل گرمایش جهانی سامانه تولید کلزا دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Optimization, Economic Model, and Global Warming Potential Assessment of the Canola Production System in Mehran County

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamidreza Shirkhani 1
  • Amir Azizpanah 1
  • Kamran Kheiralipour 1
  • Aziz Maraseli 2
1 Department of Biosystems, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.
2 Department of Economics, Faculty of Humanities, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
Efficient energy management and reduction of environmental impacts are essential for sustainable agricultural production. This study aimed to optimize energy consumption, evaluate economic performance, and assess greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential (GWP) of the canola production system in Mehran County. Data were collected through questionnaires and face-to-face interviews with farmers, and all inputs and outputs were converted into energy equivalents. Energy indices and economic indicators were calculated, and the Cobb–Douglas production function was applied to analyze input sensitivity. Technical, pure technical, and scale efficiencies were estimated using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Results showed that diesel fuel and electricity were the main contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. Input optimization reduced CO₂, N₂O, and CH₄ emissions and significantly decreased GWP, while improving energy efficiency, economic viability, and overall sustainability of the production system.
Introduction
Canola (Brassica napus L.) is an important oilseed crop widely used for edible oil production, animal feed, and industrial applications. Expansion of canola cultivation has increased the consumption of energy-intensive inputs such as fossil fuels, chemical fertilizers, electricity, and agricultural machinery. Although these inputs improve yield, their excessive use raises production costs and intensifies environmental impacts, particularly greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential. Evaluating energy consumption patterns and improving input efficiency are therefore essential for enhancing productivity and long-term sustainability. The Cobb–Douglas production function is commonly used to analyze input–output relationships and returns to scale, while Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) provides an effective tool for measuring technical efficiency and identifying input-saving potentials. In addition, assessing greenhouse gas emissions associated with agricultural inputs is critical for mitigating climate change. Accordingly, this study integrates energy, economic, efficiency, and environmental analyses to evaluate and optimize the canola production system in Mehran County.
Materials and Methods
Data were collected from 32 canola-producing farmers in Mehran County using questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. Quantities of all inputs and outputs were converted into energy equivalents based on standard coefficients. Energy indices, including energy efficiency, energy productivity, energy intensity, and net energy, were calculated to assess system performance and resource use efficiency. Economic indicators such as total production cost, gross income, net profit, and benefit-to-cost ratio were estimated to evaluate economic viability. Sensitivity analysis and the Cobb–Douglas production function were employed to determine the contribution and elasticity of different inputs to crop yield. Technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, and scale efficiency were estimated using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) under constant and variable returns to scale. Greenhouse gas emissions (CO₂, N₂O, and CH₄) related to fuel, fertilizer, and electricity consumption were calculated, and global warming potential (GWP) was estimated to assess the environmental effects of input optimization.

Results and Discussion
The results indicated that diesel fuel and electricity consumption accounted for the largest share of greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential in the canola production system. Optimization of input use, particularly through reducing excessive labor, nitrogen fertilizer, and electricity consumption and improving diesel fuel and phosphorus fertilizer management, led to a substantial reduction in CO₂, N₂O, and CH₄ emissions. Consequently, the GWP of the production system decreased significantly, demonstrating the effectiveness of targeted energy management strategies. DEA results revealed that a considerable number of farms operated below the efficiency frontier due to technical or scale inefficiencies. Adjusting input use enabled these farms to achieve optimal efficiency levels and resulted in potential energy savings of approximately 15–35% without reducing yield. These findings confirm that efficiency improvement can simultaneously enhance economic performance and environmental sustainability.
Conclusion
This study evaluated energy consumption, economic performance, and environmental impacts of the canola production system in Mehran County. Diesel fuel and electricity were identified as the major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential, emphasizing the importance of managing energy-intensive inputs. Optimizing input use specially reducing excessive labor, nitrogen fertilizer, and electricity consumption while improving diesel fuel and phosphorus fertilizer management significantly reduced CO₂, N₂O, and CH₄ emissions and lowered GWP. DEA results showed that many farms were technically or scale inefficient, and appropriate input adjustments could save 15–35% of energy without compromising yield. Sensitivity analysis using the Cobb–Douglas production function further confirmed the overuse of some inputs and the potential for yield improvement through optimal input allocation. Overall, integrating energy, economic, efficiency, and environmental analyses provides a practical and robust framework for improving the sustainability of mechanized canola production systems.Therefore, it is recommended that agricultural policies in the Mehran region focus on reducing the consumption of energy-intensive inputs, particularly diesel fuel and electricity, and replacing them with more efficient alternatives. Furthermore, organizing training courses for farmers on integrated input management and the use of efficiency analysis can serve as an effective step toward achieving sustainable canola production with minimal environmental consequences.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Energy
  • Economic Analysis
  • Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)
  • Global Warming
  • Canola
Asgharipour, M. R., Mousavinik, S. M and Enayat, F. F. (2016). Evaluation of energy input and greenhouse gases emissions from alfalfa production in the Sistan region, Iran. Energy Reports 2: 135-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2016.05.007.
Azizi, R. Azizpanah, A and Fathi, R. (2024). Comparison and Evaluation of Environmental Impacts of Silage Corn Production by Direct and Mechanized Cultivation Methods in Mehran Plain, Iran. Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology, 13(3), 77-93. (In Persian). http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/ijae.13.3.13354.
Azizpanaha, A. and Mohammadi, V. (2018). Energy Modelling and Sensitivity Analysis of Rice production in Ilam, Iran. Journal of Applied Agriculture and Biotechnology, 3(1), 01-13.
Babaeian, M., Kheirkhah, M., Ghorbanzadeh, M and jafarian, M. (2021). Environmental hazards and energy flow in rapeseed agroecosystem Case study: North Khorasan. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 31(4), 325-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/saps.2021.44566.2637.
Czyżewski, B and Kryszak, Ł. (2025). Assessing potential reductions of agricultural GHG in countries with different land productivities: Long-term integrated efficiency in DEA hybrid meta-frontier model. PloS one, 20(2), e0315571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315571.
Dargahi, M. R., Jahan, M., Naseri, M. T and Ghorbani, R. (2016). Energy balance evaluation and economical analysis of canola production in Golestan Province. Applied Field Crops Research, 29(3), 50-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.22092/aj.2016.112697.
Dashti, G., Chavoshi, P and Rahmani, E. (2025). Economic Aspects of Energy Balance in Rainfed Wheat Production in Saqqez County. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization, 10(1), 41-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/jam.2025.63557.1295
Elsoragaby, S., Yahya, A., Mahadi, M. R., Nawi, N. M and Mairghany, M. (2019). Analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) of transplanting and broadcast seeding wetland rice cultivation. Energy, 189, 116160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116160.
Fridrihsone, A., Romagnoli, F and Cabulis, U. (2020). Environmental life cycle assessment of rapeseed and rapeseed oil produced in Northern Europe: A Latvian case study. Sustainability, 12(14), 5699. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12145699.
Hadi, M. Azizpanah, A and Ghasemi, M. (2023). Evaluating the Energy Balance and Environmental Effects of Almond Production Using Artificial Neural Networks (Case Study: Lenjan County, Isfahan Province). Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology, 12(3), 81-95. (In Persian). http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/ijae.12.3.13353.
Hesampour, R., Hassani, M., Hanafiah, M. M., & Heidarbeigi, K. (2022). Technical efficiency, sensitivity analysis and economic assessment applying data envelopment analysis approach: A case study of date production in Khuzestan State of Iran. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 21(3), 197-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2021.08.003.
Hossein, H. Y. Azizpanah, A. Namdari, M. and Shirkhani, H. 2024. Environmental life cycle assessment of corn production in tropical regions. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 20036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70923-4.
Khojastehpour, M., Nikkhah, A., & Hashemabadi, D. (2015). A comparative study of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of canola production. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 5(1), 51-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/saps.2021.44507.2634.
Khodaei joghan, A. Taki, M and Matoorian, H. (2022). Evaluating energy productivity, greenhouse gas emission, global warming potential and sustainability index of Wheat and Rapeseed agroecosystems in Khorramshahr. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Sustainable Production, 32(1). (In Persian). http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/saps.2021.44507.2634.
Khoshnevisan, B. Rafiee, Sh. Omid, M. Yousefi, M. and Movahedi, M. (2013). Modeling of energy consumption and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions in wheat production in Esfahan province of Iran using artificial neural networks. Energy. 52: 333-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.028.
Khojastehpour, M., Nikkhah, A and Hashemabadi, D. (2015). A comparative study of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of canola production. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 5(1), 51-58. https://oiccpress.com/ijamad/article/view/6753.
Meftahi, F. Azizpanah, A and Taki, M. (2025). Sustainable agricultural practices and their impact on ecological indicators: A case study of cherry production in Iran. SustainableFutures, 10, 101149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101149.
Monjezi, N. and Zaki dizaji, H. (2012). Energy and Economic Analysis of Canola Production in Iran a Case Study: Khuzestan Province. Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4(3): 227-231.
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Abdi, R., Rafiee, S., & Mobtaker, H. G. (2014). Optimization of energy required and greenhouse gas emissions analysis for orange producers using data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 311-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.019.
Nikkhah, A. Emadi, B. Shabanian, F and Hamzeh-Kalkenari, H. (2014). Energy sensitivity analysis and greenhouse gas emissions for tea production in Guilan province, Iran. Agroecology, 6 (3), 622-633. https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v6i3.29852
Omidmehr, Z. 2019. Comparison of Energy Productivity and Global Warming Potential in Rain-fed Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Production Systems, Journal Of Agroecology, 11(2), pp. 739-755. https://doi.org/ 10.22067/jag.v11i2.49739.
Payandeh, Z. Jahanbakhshi, A. Mesri-Gundoshmian, T and Clark, S. (2021). Improving energy efficiency of barley production using joint data envelopment analysis (DEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA): Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions and optimization approach. Sustainability, 13(11), 6082. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116082.
Rastegar, H. Lotfalian Dehkordi, A. Abedi, A and Taki, M. (2020). Application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) In Order to Reduction of Consumption Inputs in Silage Corn production in the Shahrekord County. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 51(2), 247-261. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2020.297972.665278
Royan, M. Khojastehpour, M. Emadi, B and Mobtaker, HG. (2012). Investigation of energy inputs for peach production using sensitivity analysis in Iran. Energy Conversion and Management. 64(1):441-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2012.07.002.
Sepahvand, M. Mobli, H. Sharifi, M and Khanali, M. (2019). Modeling of Energy Consumption Trend and Economic-Environmental Indexes Assessment of Broiler Production (Case Study: Khorramabad County). Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 50(2), 267-279. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2019.273666.665144.
Shaghozayi, S and nadi, F. (2016). Energy modeling of plum production in Golestan province. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 47(3), 541-549. (In Persian). http://dx.doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2016.59363.
Shahhoseini, H. R. and kazemi, H. (2021). Economic Analysis and Evaluating the Sustainability of Potato Production Based on Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Case Study: Golestan Province). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 31(3), 295-311.  (In Persian). http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/saps.2021.39789.2488.
Sharifi, M. (2018). Energy inputs - Yield relationship and cost analysis of melon production in Khorasan Razavi province of Iran. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food. 11: 109-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2018.02.002.
Taki, M. Ajabshirchi, Y. Abdi, R and Akbarpour, O. 2012. Analysis of energy efficiency for greenhouse cucumber production using data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique; case study: Shahreza Township. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 2(1). (In Persian).
Yousefi, M, Khoramivafa, M and Mondani, F. (2014a). Integrated evaluation of energy use, greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential for sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) agroecosystems in Iran. Atmospheric Environment, 92: 501-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.050.
Yousefi, M, Mahdavi Damghani, A and Khoramivafa, M. (2014b). Energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and assessment of sustainability index in corn agroecosystems of Iran. Science of the Total Environment, 493, 330-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.004.