ارزیابی تغییرات ویژگی‌های کیفی پودر عسل در فرآیند خشک کردن پاششی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه مهندسی مکانیک بیوسیستم دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه ارومیه - ارومیه - ایران.

چکیده

ویسکوزیته بالای عسل و ماهیت چسبنده آن، حمل­و­نقل، بسته­بندی و کاربردش در صنعت غذا به عنوان افزودنی را با مشکل روبه­رو می­کند. برخی از این مشکلات با عرضه محصول به شکل پودر قابل حل است. هدف از این پژوهش، تولید پودر عسل در خشک­کن­پاششی و بررسی ویژگی­های کیفی محصول نهایی پودر می­باشد. در این پژوهش پودر عسل با دستگاه خشک­کن­پاششی در سه سطح دمای هوای 120، 150 و180درجه سلسیوس، سه سطح فشار اتمایزر 5/0، 1 و 5/1 بار و نسبت­های 15، 5/32 و 50 درصد کمک­خشک­کن مالتودکسترین نسبت به جرم ماده خشک عسل  به روش سطح پاسخ مطالعه شد. در تحقیقات قبلی دما و درصد حامل بررسی و نقش فشاراتمایزر در تولید پودر عسل کمتر مورد مطالعه بوده است. فاکتورهای فیزیکوشیمیایی مورد ارزیابی شامل محتوای­رطوبت، فعالیت­آبی، چگالی، جریان­پذیری، رنگ و pH، درصدساکارز، نسبت فروکتوز به گلوکز و HMF پودر مورد بررسی و آزمایش قرار گرفتند. نتایج آنالیز واریانس نشان داد که در اغلب شاخص­ها، اثر دما و درصد مالتودکسترین در سطح 5 درصد معنی­دار بوده و بر کیفیت نهایی پودر عسل تأثیر مستقیم دارد. بر این اساس در ۹ ویژگی از ۱۱ ویژگی، دما اثر معنی‌دار داشته و غالباً مهم‌ترین عامل تغییرات است. دما به ویژه بر رطوبت، فعالیت­آبی، چگالی، جریان‌پذیری،HMF  و شاخص‌های رنگی بیشترین تأثیر را نشان داد. درصد ­مالتودکسترین در بیشتر ویژگی‌ها به‌خصوص فعالیت­آبی، pH، ساکارز، نسبت فروکتوز به گلوکز و گرایش به زردی اثر معنی‌دار داشت. فشار در چند ویژگی مهم مانند محتوای­رطوبت، چگالی، فعالیت­آبی و گرایش به زردی و HMF اثر معنی‌دار داشت. نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد که بهترین شرایط این فرآیند در دمای ورودی 170180 سلسیوس، فشار 1 تا 5/1 بار و درصد حامل 4550 حاصل شد. در این شرایط، پودری با رطوبت زیر 2 درصد، فعالیت­آبی کمتر از 3/0، جریان‌پذیری بالا، روشنایی مطلوب و مقدار HMF پایین به‌دست آمد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Quality Changes in Honey Powder During the Spray Drying Process

نویسندگان [English]

  • َArash Jebelli Moghaddam
  • Ali Hassanpour
  • Faroogh Sharifian
  • Adel Hosainpour
  • Ahmad Piri
Department of Mechanical Engineering of Biosystems, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The high viscosity and inherent stickiness of honey pose substantial challenges for handling, transport, packaging, and its incorporation as a food ingredient. Converting honey into a powder can mitigate many of these constraints and broaden its practical applications. This study aimed to produce honey powder via spray drying and to characterize the physicochemical quality of the resulting product. Spray drying was conducted at three inlet air temperatures (120, 150, and 180 °C), three atomization pressures (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 bar), and three maltodextrin carrier levels (15, 32.5, and 50% w/w, based on honey dry matter). Process conditions were optimized using response surface methodology, with particular emphasis on atomization pressure as a key operating variable. The powder was evaluated for moisture content, water activity, bulk density, flowability, color parameters, pH, sucrose content, fructose-to-glucose ratio, and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) concentration. Analysis of variance indicated that inlet air temperature and maltodextrin concentration significantly affected (p < 0.05) most quality attributes. Temperature influenced 9 of the 11 measured responses and was the dominant factor overall, with pronounced effects on moisture, water activity, bulk density, flowability, HMF formation, and color indices. Maltodextrin concentration significantly affected water activity, pH, sucrose content, fructose-to-glucose ratio, and yellowness. Atomization pressure also contributed significantly to several critical responses, including moisture content, bulk density, water activity, yellowness, and HMF concentration. Multi-response optimization identified optimal conditions at an inlet air temperature of 170–180 °C, atomization pressure of 1.0–1.5 bar, and maltodextrin concentration of 45–50%. Under these settings, the process yielded honey powder with moisture content below 2%, water activity below 0.30, high flowability, desirable lightness, and low HMF levels.
Introduction
Honey is a highly hygroscopic and sticky material, making its storage, handling, and industrial application difficult. Spray drying is an effective technique for converting liquid honey into powder, improving shelf life, flowability, and product stability. However, the high sugar content and low glass transition temperature of honey often cause stickiness and wall deposition during drying. Maltodextrin is commonly used as a carrier to overcome these limitations. Although previous studies have mainly focused on inlet air temperature and carrier concentration, the influence of atomizer pressure has received limited attention. Therefore, this study investigated the combined effects of inlet temperature, maltodextrin concentration, and atomizer pressure on the physicochemical properties of spray-dried honey powder.
Materials and Methods
Honey (Azar Kando, Iran) was mixed with maltodextrin at 15, 32.5, and 50% (w/w) and dried using a laboratory-scale spray dryer. Process optimization was performed using a Box–Behnken response surface design with three independent variables: inlet air temperature (120–180 °C), atomizer pressure (0.5–1.5 bar), and maltodextrin concentration (15–50%). Seventeen experimental runs were conducted. The responses included moisture content, water activity, bulk density, flowability, pH, sucrose, fructose/glucose (F/G) ratio, hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), and color parameters (L*, a*, and b*).
Results and Discussion
Response surface models adequately described all responses, with inlet air temperature identified as the most influential processing factor. Increasing temperature and maltodextrin concentration significantly reduced moisture content and water activity, while higher atomizer pressure further enhanced drying by producing finer droplets. The lowest moisture (<2%) and water activity (<0.30) were achieved at high temperature, high carrier concentration, and high pressure. Bulk density and flowability improved with increasing temperature and maltodextrin concentration. Higher atomizer pressure also enhanced powder flowability through the formation of smaller and more uniform particles. A slight increase in pH was observed with increasing temperature and maltodextrin concentration. Sucrose content increased under higher temperature and carrier levels, indicating better sugar retention during drying. In contrast, the fructose/glucose ratio decreased with increasing temperature and pressure because fructose is more susceptible to thermal degradation, whereas higher maltodextrin concentrations protected fructose and helped preserve this ratio. HMF formation increased markedly at temperatures above 150 °C due to enhanced sugar degradation and non-enzymatic browning. Nevertheless, increasing maltodextrin concentration and atomizer pressure partially reduced HMF formation by shortening drying time and protecting sugars from excessive thermal damage. Color was also affected by processing conditions. Increasing temperature reduced lightness (L*) and increased redness (a*), reflecting stronger browning reactions. Maltodextrin improved lightness by protecting color compounds, while atomizer pressure showed only a minor influence on color compared with temperature. Unlike most previous studies, this work demonstrated that atomizer pressure is an important process variable. Although its effect was generally smaller than that of temperature, optimizing atomizer pressure significantly improved moisture removal, water activity, flowability, and HMF control, thereby enhancing overall powder quality.
Conclusion
The physicochemical quality of spray-dried honey powder was mainly governed by inlet air temperature, followed by maltodextrin concentration and atomizer pressure. High temperature improved drying efficiency and powder flowability but promoted HMF formation and darkening. Maltodextrin protected sugars, improved powder stability, and enhanced lightness. Most importantly, this study confirmed that atomizer pressure, a parameter rarely investigated in previous honey spray-drying studies, plays a significant role in improving drying performance and final product quality. Multi-response optimization indicated that inlet temperatures of 170–180 °C, 45–50% maltodextrin, and 1.0–1.5 bar atomizer pressure provided the best balance between low moisture, low water activity, high flowability, acceptable HMF levels, and desirable color characteristics. These findings provide practical guidance for industrial production of high-quality honey powder and emphasize the importance of incorporating atomizer pressure into future spray-drying optimization studies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Atomizer Pressure
  • Honey Powder
  • Maltodextrin
  • Spray Drying
  • Quality Analysis
Anonymous. (2015). Agricultural Statistics of Iran. General Office of Statistics and Information, Ministry of Agriculture Jihad.
AOAC. (2000). Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 27 Arlington, VA, USA.
AOAC. (1995). Official Methods of Analysis, In K. Helrich (Ed.) Arlington, VA, USA. Association of official Analytical Chemists, Inc.
Bansal, V., Sharma, H. K., & Nanda, V. (2014). Effect of honey additionon flowability and solubility of spray dried low fat milkpowder. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 49, 1196–1202.
Berhe, A., Tesfaye, E., & Terle, D. (2018). Evaluation of physicochemical properties of honey bees (Apis mellifera) in Godere Woreda, Gambella, Ethiopia. American Journal of Food Science and Technology, 6(1), 50-56.
Codex Stan (1981). Codex Alimentarius Comission CAS/RvS 12/1969, Recommended European Regional Standard for Honey, FAO/WHCXed., Rome. Codex Stan 12–1981, Rev.l (1987), Rev.2 (2001).
Codex Stan, (2001). Harmonized Methods of the International honey commission. 12-1981, Rev.1 (1987), Rev.2 (2001)
Codex Stan, (2000). Honey quality methods of analysis and international regulatory standards review of the work of the international honey commission –Swiss bee research center
Elmi A, Esmaiili M,. (2013). Feasibility of production and investigation of physicochemical properties of dried honey using freeze drying and microwave drying methods. J Food science and tech.; 10(41):p.117-124.
Fazaeli, M,. Djomeh, Z,. Ashtari, A,. Omid, M,. (2012). Effect of spray drying conditions and feed composition on the physical properties of black mulberry juice powder. Food and Bioproducts Processing, Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages 667-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2012.04.006
Fan, Z., Shen, H., Hu, T., Yu, L., Xu, Y., Wu, J., ... & Yu, Y. (2024). Effect of liquid nitrogen spray quick-freezing technology on the quality of bamboo shoots, Dendrocalamus brandisii from Yunnan Province, China. Journal of Food Engineering, 368, 111916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2023.111916
Ganaie, T, A. Masoodi, F, A. Rather, S. Gani, A. (2021). Exploiting maltodextrin and whey protein isolate macromolecules as carriers for the development of freeze-dried honey powder. Journal of Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications 2. 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2021.100040
Getachew, A., Gizaw, H., Assefa, D., & Tajebe, Z. (2014). Physico-chemical properties of honey produced in Masha, Gesha, and Sheko districts in Southwestern Ethiopia. Current Research in Agricultural Sciences, 1(4), 110-116.
Gomes, S., Dias, L. G., Moreira, L. L., Rodrigues, P., & Estevinho, L. (2010). Physicochemical, microbiological and antimicrobial properties of commercial honeys from Portugal. Food and chemical toxicology, 48(2), 544-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.11.029
Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran (ISIRI). (2007). Honey — Specifications and test methods (6th revision). National Standard of Iran No. 92. Tehran: ISIRI
Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran (ISIRI). (2013). Honey — Microbiological specifications and test methods. National Standard of Iran No. 7610. Tehran: ISIRI.
Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran (ISIRI). (2013). Honey — Determination of sugars by gas chromatography. National Standard of Iran No. 12187. Tehran: ISIRI.
Jaya, S., & Das, H. (2004). Effect of maltodextrin, glycerol monostearate and tricalcium phosphate on vacuum dried mango powder properties. Journal of Food Engineering, 63, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00135-3
Krishnamurthy, K., Khurana, HK., Soojin,  J,Irudayaraj,  J.,  Demirci,  A.  (2008). Infrared Heating in Food Processing: An Overview. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Safety 7:2-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2007.00024.x
Mutlu, C. Koç, A. Erbaş, M. (2020). Some physical properties and adsorption isotherms of vacuum-dried honey powder with different carrier materials. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 134, 110166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110166
Nadali, N., Mirnajmi, R., Mirnajmi, B., Etemadiniya, H.. (2022). Production of honey powder by spraying method and its use as a sugar substitute in cookie production. The First National Congress on Confection and Chocolate. (In Persian).
Nadeem, H. S., Dinçer, C., Torun, M., Topuz, A., & Ozdemir, F. (2013). Influence of inlet air temperature and carrier material on the production of instant soluble sage  by spray drying, LWT-Food Science and Technology, 52: 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2013.01.007
Nadeem, H. S., Torun, M., & Ozdemir, F. (2011). Spray drying of the mountain tea  water extract by using different hydrocolloid carriers, LWT-Food Science and Technology, 44(7): 1626-1635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2011.02.009
Nurhadi, B.; Maidannyk, V.A.; Djali, M.; Dwiyanti, E.H.; Editha, N.P.; Febrian, M. (2022). Physical and functional properties ofagglomerated coconut sugar powder and honey powder polyvinylpyrrolidone as a binder. Int. J. Food Prop.,25, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2021.2023177
Nurhadi, B., & Roos, Y.H. (2016). Dynamic Water Sorption for the Study of Amorphous Content of vacuum dried honey powder. Journal of Powder Technology 301: 981-988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.07.055
Nurhadi, B.; Andoyo, R.; Indiarto, R. (2012). Study the Properties of Honey Powder Produced from Spray Drying and Vacuum Drying. International Food Research Journal 19 (3): 849-854.
Quek, S. Y., Chok, N. K., & Swedlund, P. (2007). The physicochemical properties of spray-dried watermelon powders. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 46, 386–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2006.06.020
Qi Zheng, Xiaojie Wang, Yi Li , Huiping Fan, Zhen Li, Zhilu Ai, Yong Yang. (2024). Effect of dried honey powder on the quality and flavor of Chinese steamed buns premicrofermented with Pediococcus pentosaceus. Biao Suo, College of Food Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.115925
Samborska, K.; Jedli´nska, A.; Wiktor, A.; Derewiaka, D.; Wołosiak, R.; Matwijczuk, A.; Jamróz, W.; Skwarczy´nska-Maj.; et al. (2019). The Effect of Low-Temperature Spray Drying with Dehumidified Air on Phenolic Compounds, Antioxidant Activity, and Aroma Compounds of Rapeseed Honey Powders. Food Bioprocess Technol.12,pages 919–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-019-02260-8
Silva, M.A. Sobral, P.J.A.,  Kieckbusch., T.G. (2006). State diagrams of freeze-dried camu–camu (Myrciaria dubia (HBK) Mc Vaugh) pulp with and without maltodextrin addition. Journal of Food Engineering, 77(3), 426-432. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.07.009
Tonon, R., Brabet, C., Hubinger, M,. Baroni, A., Gibert, O,. Pallet, D,. (2009). Water sorption and glass transition temperature of spray dried açai (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) juice., LWT-Food Engineering, Volume 94, Issue 3-4, Pages 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.03.009
Tonon, R.V.; Brabet, C.; Hubinger, M.D. (2010). Anthocyanin stability and antioxidant activity of spray dried ac¸ai (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) juice powder produced with different carrier agents. Int. Food Res. J., 43, 907–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.12.013
Vosoghi, M. Yousefi, S. Honarvar, M. (2025). Physicochemical and sensory properties of honey powder from different climatic regions. Applied Food Research 5 100843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2025.100843