تحلیل ابعاد اقتصادی بیلان انرژی در تولید گندم دیم شهرستان سقز

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی - دانشکده کشاورزی - دانشگاه تبریز - تبریز - ایران

چکیده

بهره‌گیری اصولی از نهاده‌های انرژی در جریان تولید محصولات کشاورزی موچب ارتقای کارایی و بهره‌وری و نهایتا کاهش هزینه و تاثیر منفی نهاده‌ها بر منابع طبیعی و محیط‌زیست می‌شود. محدودیت منابع ضرورت و اهمیت بررسی پیرامون چنبه های اقتصادی بیلان انرژی در بخش کشاورزی را نمایان می‌کند. از این رو هدف اصلی مطالعه حاضر تحلیل ابعاد اقتصادی بیلان انرژی در تولید گندم دیم شهرستان سقز ‌می‌باشد. بدین منظور داده‌های لازم از ۲۷۰ کشاورز گندم‌کار منطقه جمع آوری گردید و با تبدیل مقادیر نهاده‌ها و ستاده (گندم) به هم‌ارز انرژی نسبت به برآورد تابع تولید ترانسلوگ و محاسبه تولید نهایی و کشش عوامل اقدام گردید همچنین شاخص‌های انرژی نیز محاسبه شد. تخمین تابع ترانسلوگ نشانگر ان بود که انرژی عوامل تولید نیروی کار، سموم و ماشین‌ها دارای تأثیر معنی‌داری بر انرژی خروجی محصول گندم می‌باشند. مقادیر مربوط به کشش نهاده‌ها موید استفاده اقتصادی از کود و نیروی کار بود در حالیکه از نهاده نیروی کار به شکل غیراقتصادی بهره گرفته می‌شود. مقادیر شاخص‌های کارایی و بهره‌وری به ترتیب معادل ۰۲/۳و ۱۱/۰ کیلوگرم بر مگاژول بدست آمد. با توجه به نتایج توصیه می‌شود کشاورزان با استفاده اصولی و تخصیص بهینه منابع به افزایش تولید و سودآوری کمک نمایند زیرا بهره‌گیری اقتصادی از عوامل می‌تواند سبب بهبود کارایی مزارع و بهره‌وری عوامل تولید گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Economic Aspects of Energy Balance in Rainfed Wheat Production in Saqqez County

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ghader Dashti
  • Parinaz Chavoshi
  • Elham Rahmani
Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]

The efficient use of energy inputs in agricultural production processes enhances farm efficiency, improves factor productivity, and ultimately reduces costs and the negative environmental impacts of inputs on natural resources. Given the limited availability of resources, studying the economic aspects of energy balances in the agricultural sector is crucial. This research aims to analyze the economic aspects of energy balance in rainfed wheat production in Saqqez County. Data were collected from 270 farmers in the region, and input and output (wheat) values were converted into energy equivalents. A translog production function was estimated to determine the marginal product and elasticity of production factors. The results revealed that labor, pesticides, and machinery energy significantly impact wheat output energy. While the elasticity values confirm the economic use of fertilizer and labor, labor is considered non-economic. Energy efficiency and productivity indices were calculated at 3.02 and 0.11 kg/MJ, respectively. The findings suggest that farmers can enhance production and profitability through the economic use and allocation of resources, as optimizing input consumption improves farm efficiency and factor productivity.
Introduction
The agricultural sector's heavy reliance on fossil fuels and the limited availability of energy resources have prompted researchers to evaluate energy consumption efficiency in crop production across various regions. Optimal and efficient use of energy inputs can lead to increased productivity, reduced environmental impacts, and the establishment of sustainable food production systems. Efficient energy use in agricultural production processes improves farm efficiency and factor productivity while minimizing costs and the adverse effects of inputs on natural resources and the environment. The scarcity of resources underscores the importance of studying the economic aspects of energy balances in agriculture. In Saqqez County, despite the large area dedicated to rainfed wheat cultivation, the low production output highlights the potential for increased productivity. Therefore, investigating energy balance and its efficiency is essential. This study focuses on analyzing the economic aspects of energy balance in rainfed wheat production in Saqqez County.
Materials and Methods
Data were collected from 270 farmers in Saqqez County, and input and output (wheat) values were converted into energy equivalents. A translog production function was estimated to examine the relationship between input energy and output. Production elasticity was calculated to determine the economic or non-economic use of inputs. Production elasticity measures the change in output resulting from changes in input consumption. When the marginal product is less than the average product, production elasticity ranges between 0 and 1, indicating the economic use of a factor. Additionally, energy efficiency and productivity indices were calculated based on input and output energy equivalents.
Results and Discussion
The translog production function estimation revealed that labor, fertilizer, pesticides, and machinery energy significantly affect wheat output energy. The R² value of 0.76 indicates that 76% of the variation in output energy is explained by these input variables. The energy elasticity of machinery, fertilizer, and seeds was greater than one and positive, confirming their economic use. In contrast, labor input elasticity was negative, suggesting that its overuse places it in the third stage of production. Overall, the results confirm the economic use of fertilizer and seeds, while labor is considered non-economic by farmers. Energy efficiency and productivity indices were calculated at 3.02 and 0.11 kg/MJ, respectively.
Conclusion
Although seeds and fertilizer are generally used economically, some farmers apply these inputs at non-optimal levels, either in the first stage (non-economic) or the third stage (excessive use). Negative elasticity for labor indicates its overuse, driven by its abundance and low cost, which harms productivity and the environment. Farmers can reduce labor consumption and optimize the allocation of other inputs to lower costs and increase profits. By adopting economic principles in resource use, farmers can enhance production and profitability, as efficient input consumption improves farm efficiency and factor productivity. These findings highlight the importance of optimizing energy inputs to achieve sustainable agricultural practices

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Energy balance
  • Energy index
  • Translog production function
  • Production elasticity
  • Wheat
Abdollahpour, S., Zaree, S. (2010). Evaluation of wheat energy balance under rain fed farming in kermanshahJournal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 20(1), 97-106. (In Persian).  https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24764310.1389.20.1.8.9.
Aigner, D., Lovell, C. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5.
Ajabshirchi, Y., Taki, M., Abdi, R., Ghobadifar, A., & Ranjbar, I. (2011). Investigation of Energy Use Efficiency for Dry Wheat Production Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach; Case Study: Silakhor Plain. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 1(2),122-132. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v1i2.11360.
Anonymous. (2023). Kurdistan Agricultural Organization. www. kurdistan.agri-jahad.ir. (In Persian).
Aydın, B., Aktürk, D., Özkan, E., Hurma, H., & Kiracı, M. A. (2019). Comparative energy use efficiency and economic analysis of apple production in Turkey: Case of Thrace Region. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 61(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-018-0387-5.
Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1992). Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3,153-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158774.
Belete, A. S. (2020). Analysis of technical efficiency in maize production in Guji Zone: Stochastic frontier model. Agriculture & Food Security, 9(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-020-00270-w.
Chavoshi, P., Dashti, G., and Vahedi, J. (2023). Analyzing Economical of Energy Balance in rainfed wheat Production in Ahar County. The Third National Conference on Green Waste Management, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/JAM.2023.56088.1237.
 Christensen, L.R., Jorgenson, D.W. and Lau, L.J. (1971). Conjugate and transcendental Logarithmic function, Econometrical, 39: 68-259.
Dashti, G., Aminian, F., Hosseinzad, J., & Hayati, B. (2010). Determining economic value of water in wheat production (Case study: underground water resources in Damghan region. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production (Journal of Agricultural Science), 20(1), 121-211. (In Persian). https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.24764310.1389.20.1.10.1.
Dashti, G., Baghban Adami, R., and Hayati, B. (2024). Energy Efficiency of Canola Production in Tabriz County: Application of the Stochastic Frontier Function and Energy Index Approaches. Agricultural Mechanization, 8(4),1-12. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/jam.2024.60809.1273.
Emami Meibodi, A. (2005). Efficiency and Productivity Measurement (In Theory and Practice). Institute of Trade Studies and Research.  (In Persian).
Fathi, R., Amjadpor, F., Kouchakzadeh, A., & Azizpanah, A. (2018). The pattern and efficiency of energy use for wheat production by data envelopment analysis, case study: Chardavol Township, Ilam Province. Iranian Dryland Agronomy Journal, 7(1), 33-46. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22092/idaj.2018.116527.189.
 Gokdogan, O., & Sevim, B. (2016). Determination of energy balance of wheat production in Turkey: A case study of Eskil district. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(4).(In Persian). http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24763128.1392.2.3.1.4.
 Hassanzadeh Aval, F., Rezvani Moghaddam, P. (2013). Energy efficiency evaluation and economical analysis of onion production in khorasan razavi province of Iran. Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology;2(3),1-11. (in persion) http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24763128.1392.2.3.1.4.
Heidarisoltanabadi M. (2021). Determination of energy production function in irrigated wheat of Isfahan province. Energy Engineering & Management; 11 (1) :116-127. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22052/11.1.116.
Hong, Y., Heerink, N., Zhao, M., and Van der Werf, W. (2019). Intercropping contributes to a higher technical efficiency in smallholder farming: Evidence from a case study in Gaotai County, China. Agricultural Systems, 173, 317-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.007.
Koopahi, M. (2013). Principles of Agricultural Economic. University of Tehran Press. (In Persian)
Kordooni, F., Jamiolahmadi, M., & Bakhshi, M. R. (2018). Econometric analysis of energy use in cereal production of Iran (Case Study: wheat, Barley, Corn, Rice). Agricultural Economics Research, 10(37), 133-148. (In Persian)
Molaeei, K. and Afzalinia, S. (2012). Determination of energy indices in producing wheat and canola in Dashte Namdan Agro-industry (Eghlid region, Fars). Journal of Plant Eco physiology, 1,26-36. (In Persian)
Nikoukar, A. (2020). Analyzing economical and environmental dimensions of energy balance in sugar beet production in Iran. Agricultural Economics, 14(1), 115-143. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/iaes.2020.129241.1774.
Ozkan, B., Ceylan, R. and Kizilay, H. )2011(. Energy inputs and crop yield relationships in greenhouse winter crop tomato production. Renewable Energy 36: 3217-3221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.03.042.
Singh, H. Singh, A.K. Kushwaha, H.L. and Singh, A. (2007). Energy consumption pattern of wheat production in India. Energy.32(10):1848-1854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2007.03.001.
Taghinazhad, J., and Vahedi, A. (2022). Energy consumption modeling and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for irrigated wheat production; case study: Ardabil province. Agricultural Mechanization, 6(4), 11-19. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/jam.2022.14202.
Vu T, Peng K, and Chung R., (2019). Evaluation of environmental efficiency of edible Canna production in Vietnam.  Agriculture, 9(11), 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9110242.
Uysal, O., Aydin, B., Subaşi, O. S., & Aktaş, E. (2021). Effect of good agricultural practices on energy use in citrus farming in Turkey: case of Mersin province. Horticultural Studies, 38(2), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.16882/hortis.1014533.
Yelmen, B, Shahin, H.H and Chakir, M.T. (2019). Energy efficiency and economic analysis in tomato production: A case study of mersin province in the Mediterranean region. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 17(4): 7371-7379. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1704_73717379.