مزایای استفاده از بی‌خاک‌ورزی در کشت نخود در استان آذربایجان شرقی (مطالعه موردی شهرستان چاراویماق)

نویسندگان

1 بخش کشاورزی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

2 بخش کشاورزی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

در این مطالعه تأثیر روش خاک‌ورزی و کاشت بذور بر رشد و عملکرد نخود سنجیده شد. آزمایش به صورت طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با پنج تکرار انجام شد. تیمارها شامل کاشت سنتی (دست‌پاش)، کاشت با دستگاه خاکورز مرکب و کاشت با خطی‌کار کشت مستقیم بود. در کاشت سنتی، پس از پخش بذور بصورت دستی از گاوآهن برگردان‌دار استفاده شد. از خاک‌ورز مرکب نیز پس از پخش دستی بذور استفاده شد. در کاشت با خطی‌کار کشت مستقیم از زمین شخم نخورده دارای بقایای گندم استفاده گردید. دو تیمار کاشت با دستگاه خاک‌ورز مرکب، و کاشت با خطی‌کار کشت مستقیم، افزایش به ترتیب 6/30 و 7/39 درصدی را در عملکرد دانه باعث شدند، در حالی که در بین اجزای اصلی عملکرد دانه، تیمار کاشت با خطی‌کار کشت مستقیم افزایش بیشتری را در تعداد دانه در بوته باعث شده و این صفت را به میزان 1/26 درصد افزایش داد، کاشت با دستگاه خاک‌ورز مرکب این صفت را به میزان 6/14 درصد افزود. صفات رویشی مانند وزن برگ و سطح برگ تحت تأثیر کاشت با دستگاه خاک‌ورز مرکب و کاشت با خطی‌کار کشت مستقیم افزایش یافت. که میزان افزایش کاشت با خطی‌کار کشت مستقیم بیشتر بود. روش‌های خاک‌ورزی حفاظتی عملکرد بهتری نسبت به روش سنتی ارائه کردند. در ضمن میان عملکرد دو تیمار حفاظتی تفاوت معناداری دیده نشد. با توجه به هزینه‌های کمتر، روش حفاظتی بر سنتی ارجحیت دارد، البته فاکتورهایی نظیر قیمت ماشین‌آلات، زمان انجام عملیات و مقدار مصرف سوخت نیاز به بررسی‌های بیشتر دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Advantages of Using No-Till in Chickpea Cultivation in East Azarbaijan Province (A Case Study of Charoimak County)

نویسندگان [English]

  • esmaeil seidi 1
  • Behzad Hajizade 2
1 Agricultural Department of Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Agricultural Department of Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effect of tillage and sowing techniques on chickpea growth and yield in the Charoimak district of Eastern Azarbaijan. Maintaining crop residues on the soil surface by using conservation tillage significantly reduces weed germination. Conservation tillage improves carbon fixation in the soil and significantly prevents its release into the atmosphere.
Materials and methods: The study was conducted in a randomized complete block design with five replications. Some parameters were measured, such as establishment percent, plant height, number of main branches, stem weight, leaf number, leaf index, leaf eight, root depth, grain weight in each plant, biomass of plants, and harvest index. At the seed maturity stage, chickpea plants were randomly harvested and the desired traits were measured. Plants from each plot were harvested from the middle rows of the plots after considering the 0.5 m margin effect.
Results: Linear sowing with a combinate machine and conservation tillage method resulted in a 30.6 % and 39.7 % increase in seed yield compared to traditional sowing. Planting with protective tillers statistically caused a similar increase in grain yield. Whereas, among the main components of grain yield, the conservation tillage treatment increased the number of grains per plant as compared to linear sowing and increased this trait by 26.1%, while the treatment of Linear implantation increased this attribute by 14.6%. One hundred seed weight increased by only 14% compared to traditional seed sowing under linear sowing. Percentage of chickpea seed emergence only increased the effect of planting with protective tillage by 10.9% compared to traditional seed planting. Vegetative traits such as leaf weight and leaf area were increased under linear tillage and with conservation tillage, which was increased by planting with conservation tillage.
Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that there was no significant difference in germination percentage, number of leaves, number of main branches, and stem weight between planting with a compound tiller and traditional seed planting. However, planting with a direct-tillage row cultivator led to a significant increase in these traits. Specifically, the direct tillage treatment resulted in increases of 10.9%, 21.8%, 76.9%, and 82.9% in these traits, respectively. Notably, the direct tillage treatment had the greatest impact on stem mass. Additionally, in terms of plant height, root development depth, seed mass per plant, and seed yield per hectare, both the combined tillage and direct tillage treatments caused statistically significant and similar increases. Among these traits, the most substantial increase attributed to the direct tillage treatment was observed in leaf dry weight, which rose by 185%. The study found that the grain yield under the direct tillage treatment increased primarily due to an increase in the number of seeds. In contrast, the combined tillage treatment improved grain yield by increasing both the number of seeds and the weight of one hundred seeds.
 Overall, Conservation tillage methods had a higher yield than conventional systems and there was no significant difference between yields of conservative methods treatments. Concerning the reduction of costs, a direct drilling method is suggested. Of course, some important factors like machine prices and investment, the time needed to complete sowing operation in each system, and fuel consumption should be processed more.
It is suggested that:
- To ensure the results and generalize them, the experiments be repeated in different regions of the province.
- The effect of planting methods on the physical and chemical properties of the soil affecting the growth of chickpea plants should be investigated.
- The effect of planting methods on the phenological characteristics of chickpeas should be investigated.
- The effect of planting methods on the biological and symbiotic characteristics of chickpeas should be investigated.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Charoimak Chickpea
  • Conservation Tillage
  • Yield
Abdul Quddus, G., H. Mahammad Naser, Md. Alamgir Siddiky, Md. Razzab Ali, A. T. M. Anwarul Islam Mondol & Md. Anarul Islam. (2020). Impact of zero tillage and tillage practice in chickpea production. Journal of Agricultural Science. 4: 106-118. Doi:10.5539/jas. v12n4p106.
Akbarnia, A., R. Alimardani, Sh. Baharloeyan. (2010). Performance comparison of three tillage systems in wheat farms. AJCS 4(8):586-589.
Akgün, N., T. Marakoğlu, K. Çarman. (2018). Effect of tillage systems on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) productivity: seed yield and yield components. Selcuk J Agr Food Sci, 32 (3): 394-398. Doi:10.15316/SJAFS.2018.111.
Aziz, N., M. Suleimenov, T. Friedric, F.Tahe, R. Ikramov and N.Nurjanov. (2012). Effect of tillage methods on productivity of winter wheat in the aral sea basin of uzbekistan. Journal of Arid Land Studies. 22: 255 -258. Doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2558-7_2.
Begam, A., D.C. Roy, M. Ray and S. Biswas. (2018). Conservation agriculture: a new paradigm in modern agriculture to increase resource use efficiency. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences. 10: 7168-7171.
Bertol, I., F.T. Barbosa, A.L. Mafra, and M.C. Flores. (2014). Soil water erosion under different cultivation systems and different fertilization rates and forms over 10 years. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 38: 1918-28. Doi:10.1590/S0100-06832014000600026.
Bhan, S, and U.K. Behera. (2014) Conservation agriculture in India– Problems, prospects and policy issues. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 2: 1-12. Doi:10.1016/S2095-6339(15)30053-8.
Bimbraw, A. S. (2016). Use of conservation technology for the improvement in production of chickpea in comparison to wheat. Current Agriculture Research Journal, 4(1): 1-15. Doi: 10.12944/CARJ.4.1.01.
Chaghazardi, H. R., M. Reza Jahansouz, A. Ahmadia, M. Gorji. (2016). Effects of tillage management on productivity of wheat and chickpea under cold, rainfed conditions in western Iran. Soil & Tillage Research 162: 26–33. Doi:10.1016/j.still.2016.04.010.
Chegeni, M., Ansari-Dust, S. H., & Eskandari, H. (2014). Effect of tillage methods and residuals management on some physical properties of soil to achieve sustainable agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 24(2), 31-40. Doi:10.22055/agen.2022.41147.1635.
Gholami, A., H. R. Asgari, and E. Zeinali. (2014). Effect of different tillage systems on soil physical properties and yield of wheat (Case study: Agricultural lands of Hakim Abad village, Chenaran township, Khorasan Razavi province). International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research. 2: 1539-1552. Doi: 10.22055/AGEN.2022.41147.1635.
Guan, D., Y. Zhang, M. M. Al-Kaisi, Q. Wang, M. Zhang, Z. Li. (2015). Tillage practices effect on root distribution and water use efficiency of winter wheat under rain-fed condition in the North China Plain. Soil & Tillage Research 146: 286–295. Doi:10.1016/j.still.2014.09.016.
Gupta, R., and Sayre, K.D. (2007). Conservation agriculture in South Asia. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge. 145: 207-214. Doi:10.1017/S0021859607006910.
Hedayatipour, A., F. Keikhaee, M. Dadivar. (2014). The Effect of Conservation Tillage Practices on Consumed Water Volume and Yield in Irrigated Wheat Crop. World Journal of Environmental Biosciences. 6: 23-26.
Iijima, M., S. Morita, W. Zegada-Lizarazu & Y. Izumi (2007) No-Tillage enhanced the dependence on surface irrigation water in wheat and soybean, Plant Production Science, 10:2, 182-188. Doi:10.1626/pps.10.182.
Khanpaye, E., & Jalilian, J. (2014). Effect of different tillage systems and seed priming on some morphological characteristics and yield of dryland chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Research in Field Crop Journal, 1(2), 33-43.
Krishnaprabu, S. (2019). Impact of using fertilizers and tillage management in oryza sativa - cicer arietinum cropping system. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering. 8: 24-31.
Majchrzak, L., Z. Sawinska, M. Natywa, G. Skrzypczak, and R. Głowicka-Wołoszyn. (2016). Impact of Different Tillage Systems on Soil. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 18: 1871-1881. Doi: 20.1001.1.16807073.2016.18.7.3.3.
Malecka, I., A. Blecharczyk1, Z. Sawinska, D. Swedrzynska, and T. Piechota. (2015). Winter wheat yield and soil properties response to longterm non-inversion tillage. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 17: 1571-1584.
Onyari, C. A. N., J. P. Ouma and A. M. Kibe. (2010). Effect of tillage method and sowing time on phenology, yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under semi-arid conditions in Kenya. Journal of Applied Biosciences 34: 2156 - 2165.
Opande, G. T., D. M. Musyimi, K. C. Muthoni. (2017). Effects of planting depth on seed germination and emergence of crotalaria brevidens on maseno soils maseno (Kenya). IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science. 10: 30-34. Doi:10.5897/AJPS2018.1728.
Paul, B.K., B. Vanlauwe, F. Ayuke, A. Gassner, M. Hoogmoed, T.T. Hurisso, S. Koala, D. Lelei, T. Ndabamenye, J. Six, M.M. Pulleman. (2013). Medium-term impact of tillage and residue management on soil aggregate stability, soil carbon and crop productivity. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 164:14-22. Doi:10.1016/j.agee.2012.10.003.
Pramanik, M. E. A., S. Mondal, K. K. Roy, M.M.I. Chowdhury and A. H. Md. Amir Faisal. (2014). Effect of sowing dates and tillage options on chickpea (Cicer arietinum) grown after transplanted aman rice using residual soil moisture at high barind tract (Hbt) in Bangladesh. KHON KAEN AGR. J. 42: 54-67.
Tang, J., C. A. Busso, D. Jiang, Y. Wang, D. Wu, A. Musa, R. Miao and C. Miao. (2016). Seed burial depth and soil water content affect seedling emergence and growth of ulmus pumila var. sabulosa in the horqin sandy land. Sustainability 8, 68. Doi:10.3390/su8010068.
Zheng, C., Y. Jiang, C. Chen, Y. Sun, J. Feng, A. Deng and W. Zhang. (2014). The impacts of conservation agriculture on crop yield in China depend on specific practices, crops and cropping regions. The Crop Journal. 2: 289-296. Doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2014.06.006.