رتبه بندی و تحلیل چالش های توسعه پایدار مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی در منطقه نی‌ریز

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه مهندسی ماشین‌های کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشکدگان کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

2 گروه مهندسی ماشین‌های کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشکدگان کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

3 گروه مهندسی ماشین های کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشکدگان کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

مکانیزاسیون یکی از راه‌های گذار از کشاورزی سنتی به کشاورزی پایدار است. مواجه شدن با منابع محدود در تولید و نهاده‌ها از یک طرف و افزایش روزافزون جمعیت از طرف دیگر، جایگاه و اهمیت مکانیزاسیون را بیش از پیش در توسعه امنیت غذایی کشور نشان می‌دهد. بنابراین می‌بایست با دیدی فراتر از یک نهاده به مکانیزاسیون نگریست، چرا که به کمک آن می‌توان ضمن مدیریت نهاده‌های بذر، کود، سم و حتی مدیریت آب و خاک، اقدام به تولید پایدار و اقتصادی نمود. بنابراین شناخت پارامترهای مؤثر بر توسعه مکانیزاسیون و در اولویت قرار دادن پارامترهای مهم برای مدیران بخش کشاورزی امری مهم می‌باشد. پارامترها به وسیله سه روش معمول مجموع ساده وزین، تاپسیس و الکتر رتبه‌بندی شدند. نتایج حاصل از رتبه‌بندی در سه روش، متفاوت بود که با ادغام سه‌گانه، یکپارچه شد و رتبه‌بندی واحدی برای پارامتر‌ها به‌دست آمد. بعد از ادغام سه‌گانه، چالش‌های عدم وجود برنامه مدون و منسجم، کوچک و پراکنده بودن بهره‌بردارهای زراعی و فرسوده بودن ماشین‌های کشاورزی در رتبه اول قرار گرفتند. پس از آن، عدم مهارت فنی کشاورز، متغیر بودن قیمت مواد اولیه، نبود تعمیرگاه در محل، مشکل اشتغال و بیکاری، عدم انتخاب بهترین روش مکانیزه، عدم کنترل و تولید نهاده‌های کشاورزی، پایین بودن کیفیت ماشین‌های کشاورزی ساخت داخل و عدم ارتباط بین کاربران ماشین‌های کشاورزی و صاحبان این صنایع در رتبه دوم تا نهم قرار گرفتند. در پایان، با یکی بودن نتایج روش تاپسیس و نتایج حاصل از ادغام سه‌گانه، روش تاپسیس به عنوان روشی مناسب برای رتبه‌بندی تأیید گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Ranking and analysis of the challenges of sustainable development of agricultural mechanization in Neyriz region

نویسندگان [English]

  • Najmeh Tavakoli 1
  • Hassan Ghasemi-Mobtaker 2
  • Mohammad Sharifi 3
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
2 Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
3 Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Mechanization is one of the transition ways from traditional agriculture to sustainable agriculture. Facing with limited resources in production and inputs on the one hand and increasing rate of population growth on the other hand demonstrate position and the importance of mechanization in the development of food security in the country more than ever. because seed, fertilizer, poison, and even soil and water inputs can be managed with its help, and sustainable production can also be achieved. multi-criteria decision making techniques were discussed to rank these parameters. The parameters were ranked by three common methods including simple additive weighting (SAW), TOPSIS and ELECTER. The results of the ranking were different in the three methods, which were integrated with the triple integration, and a uniform ranking was obtained for the parameters. After the triple merger, small and scattered agriculture holdings, worn out of agriculture machinery and the lack of a coherent and codified operational plan were in the first rank. Subsequently, lack of technical skills of the farmer, variability of raw material prices, lack of on-site repair, employment and unemployment problems, lack of best mechanization, lack of control and production of agricultural inputs, poor quality agricultural machinery produced internally and Lack of communication between agricultural machinery users and owners of these industries ranks second to ninth. Finally, according to the concordance of the results of TOPSIS method and the results of triple integration, TOPSIS method was approved as a suitable method for ranking.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mechanization
  • Sustainable Agriculture
  • Multi-attribute Decision Making Techniques
  • Neyriz Region
Amjadi, A., & Chizari, A. (2006). Status of Iranian Agricultural Mechanization. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 55, 155-182. (In Persian).
Asgharpour. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making, Chapter1: Multi Attribute Decision Making. Tehran University.  (In Persian)
Bagheri, N., Javadi, A., & Yunesi Alamoti, M. (2014). Drawing favorable conditions for agriculture in the country of Authority. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 3, 45-62. (In Persian).
Banerjee, S., & Punekar, R. M. (2020). A sustainability-oriented design approach for agricultural machinery and its associated service ecosystem development. Journal of Cleaner Production264, 121642.
Barahoei-Aval, M., Ahmadizade, M., Miri Kamk, M., & Mozafaripour, Y. (2014). Investigating Factors Affecting Mechanization Development in Rural Areas (Kashkouiee village of Dashtab district of Baft city of Kerman province). Third Conference on Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resources. Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)
Behroozilar, M. (1987). Mechanization Level and Needs in Iran. In Int Symp on agricultural mechanization and international cooperation in high technology Era, Tokyo (pp. 451-455).
Bochtis, D., Sorensen, C. A. G., & Kateris, D. (2018). Operations management in agriculture. Academic Press.
Ebne Abbasi, A. (2004). Integration of agricultural lands, the alphabet of sustainable development in agriculture: First National Conference on Sustainable Development Solutions. Ministry of Interior, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)
FAO, Sustainable Agricultural Mechanization. http://www.fao.org/sustainable-agricultural-mechanization, Fleming, P.H. (2022). Farm technical manual.
Fathi-Ashtiyani. A. (2010). Psychological tests, 171-183, Tehran. (In Persian)
Ghodsipour, H. (2002). Analytical Hierarchy data Process, Amirkabir University of Technology publisher, Tehran. (In Persian)
Hwang, C., Kwang, Y. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Chapter3: Methods of Multi Attribute Decision Making, 2, 68-75, Berlin: Springer varlag.
Keskin, A., Ikikat Tumer, E., & Birinci, A. (2010). Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Instrument and Machinery Assets in Enterprises that Deal with Agricultural Production: The case of Erzurum Province. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5, 600-605.
Kiani, F., Randazzo, G., Yelmen, I., Seyyedabbasi, A., Nematzadeh, S., Anka, F. A., ... & Muzirafuti, A. (2022). A smart and mechanized agricultural application: From cultivation to harvest. Applied Sciences12(12), 6021.
Mehrabi-Basharabadi, H., Gilanpoor, O. (2005). Investigating the Relationship between Farm Size and Level of Mechanization and Productivity of Agricultural Machinery in Kerman Province: Fifth Iranian Agricultural Economics Conference, University of Zahedan. Iran. (In Persian)
Mishra, D., & Satapathy, S. (2022). Sustainability-assessment for farm-machinery. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management13(5), 2165-2174.
Moazzen, S. A. A. (2010). Determination of the most important challenges for agricultural mechanization development in Iran. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal12(3-4), 87-91.
Mohammadi, O., Zarifiyan, Sh. (2008). Factors Affecting Mechanization: Fifth National Congress of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.  (In Persian)
Momeni, M. (2006). New topics of research in operations. 1th edition, 65-78, Tehran. Tehran University Publishers. (In Persian)
Motiee-Langroodi, S.A., Hesam, M., Cheraghi, M., Ashoor, H. (2013).  Analysis of Factors Affecting Mechanization Development in Rural Areas, Journal of Rural Researchs, 3, 481-503. (In Persian)
Mozaffari, S. (1994). The effects of mechanization on production and employment in Punjab, Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 7, 106-136. (In Persian)
Nabiyian, S., Alavi-Naeeni, S. (2012). Investigating the impact of mechanization on agricultural development, Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 3, 54-68. (In Persian)
Nepal, R., & Thapa, G. B. (2009). Determinants of agricultural commercialization and mechanization in the hinterland of a city in Nepal. Applied Geography29(3), 377-389.
Sharifi, M., Akram, A., Tavakoli, N. (2017). Evaluation and selection of the most important parameters in the distribution chain agility Combine Owners Cooperative Fars province. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 48(2), 201-209. (In Persian)
Sharifi, M., Tavakoli, N., Akram, A. (2021). Review and Rating of the Combine Owners’ Cooperative Distribution Chain in Fars Province Using TOPSIS Approach. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 52(3), 409-420. (In Persian)
Shojaei, M. (2009). Study of Mechanization and its Role in Kerman: Kerman province support services company. (In Persian)
Sims, B., & Kienzle, J. (2016). Making mechanization accessible to smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Environments3(2), 11.
Tavakoli, N., Sharifi, M., Akram, A. (2017). Performance evaluation of the most common multi criterion decision making techniques to rank the effective parameters in agility of distribution chain of combine owners in Fars province. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 48(3), 299-308. (In Persian)
Torki-Beldaji, B., & Ghanbari, Y. (2013).  Identification and analysis of factors affecting the development of agricultural mechanization in Borujen. The first conference on sustainable development of agriculture and healthy environment. Hamedan, Iran. (In Persian)
Zhao, M., Qiu, W. H., & Liu, B. S. (2010). Relative entropy evaluation method for multiple attribute decision making. Control and Decision25(7), 1098-1100.