بررسی مصرف انرژی و ارزیابی انتشارات زیست محیطی در کشت سویا و بادام زمینی: مطالعه موردی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، واحد تاکستان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تاکستان، ایران.

2 گروه مکانیک، واحد شهرقدس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

3 گروه علوم و مهندسی صنایع غذایی، دانشکده مهندسی عمران و منابع زمین، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف این تحقیق بررسی مصرف انرژی و تأثیر زیست محیطی کشت سویا و بادام زمینی، با تمرکز خاص بر یک مطالعه موردی است. کشت این محصولات برای تولید کشاورزی بسیار مهم است و درک مصرف انرژی و آسیب احتمالی آنها برای کشاورزی پایدار ضروری است. نتایج این مطالعه برای کشاورزان، سیاست گذاران و محققانی که در راستای تولید پایدار کشاورزی تلاش می کنند ارزشمند خواهد بود. این مطالعه نشان می دهد که تولید سویا در استان اردبیل با انرژی کل 20/43170 مگاژول در هکتار و همچنین انرژی خروجی 28/40417 مگاژول در هکتار و تولید بادام زمینی به 36/28677 مگاژول در هکتار کل انرژی نیاز دارد و 36/28677 مگاژول در هکتار انرژی تولید می کند. انرژی خروجی نتایج ارزیابی چرخه زندگی (LCA) نشان می دهد که انتشار گازهای گلخانه ای در مزارع ارتباط نزدیکی با نهاده های مورد استفاده در تولید سویا و بادام زمینی دارد. سوخت دیزل و کودهای شیمیایی منابع اصلی انتشار در هر دو سیستم هستند، به طوری که کشاورزی سویا به دلیل کاهش مصرف در مقایسه با بادام زمینی، سطوح بالاتری از آلاینده های سوخت دیزل را نشان می دهد. توزیع انتشار گازهای گلخانه ای از منابع مختلف در تولید سویا و بادام زمینی در این مطالعه برجسته شده است. هر دو روش تولید تأثیر قابل توجهی بر سلامت انسان دارند، به طوری که سویا مسئول 70 درصد انتشار گازهای گلخانه ای و بادام زمینی 65 درصد است. س

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation of the energy use and environmental emissions assessment in the cultivation of soybean and peanut: A case study

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abbas Sharifi Nia 1
  • Mohammad Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi 2
  • Davood Mohammad Zamani 1
  • Hamed Afshari 3
1 Department of Biosystem Engineering, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran.
2 Department of Mechanics, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Department of Food Science and Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

This research aims to explore the energy usage and environmental impact of cultivating soybean and peanut, with a specific focus on a case study. The cultivation of these crops is crucial for agricultural production, and understanding their energy use and potential damage is essential for sustainable farming. The results of this study will be valuable for farmers, policymakers, and researchers working towards sustainable agricultural production. The study reveals that soybean production in Ardabil province of total energy was 43170.20 MJ ha-1, also, output energy was 40417.28 MJ ha-1, while peanut production requires 28677.36 MJ ha-1 of total energy and produces 28677.36 MJ ha-1 of output energy. The results of the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) show that emissions on farms are closely related to the inputs used in soybean and peanut production. Diesel fuel and chemical fertilizers are the main sources of emissions in both systems, with soybean farming showing higher levels of diesel fuel pollutants due to reduced usage compared to peanuts. The distribution of emissions from different sources in soybean and peanut production is highlighted in the study. Both methods of production have a significant impact on human health, with soybean responsible for 70% of emissions and peanuts contributing 65%. Diesel fuel and nitrogen fertilizer have the most significant environmental impact, accounting for over 50% of the overall impact. Proper management of nitrogen fertilizer is essential for maximizing crop growth and yield, making it a top priority for researchers and farmers.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Energy use
  • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
  • Peanut
  • Soybean

مراجع

Ahmadbeyki, A., Ghahderijani, M., Borghaee, A., Bakhoda, H., 2023. Energy use and environmental impacts analysis of greenhouse crops production using life cycle assessment approach: A case study of cucumber and tomato from Tehran province, Iran. Energy Reports 9, 988–999.
Altieri, M.A., Funes-Monzote, F.R., Petersen, P., 2012. Agroecologically efficient agricultural systems for smallholder farmers: Contributions to food sovereignty. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 32, 1–13.
Azizpanah, A., Fathi, R., Taki, M., 2023. Eco-energy and environmental evaluation of cantaloupe production by life cycle assessment method. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 1854–1870.
Bosco, S., Bene, C. Di, Galli, M., Remorini, D., Massai, R., Bonari, E., 2011. Greenhouse gas emissions in the agricultural phase of wine production in the Maremma rural district in Tuscany, Italy. Ital. J. Agron. 6, e15–e15.
Cheng, H., Zhou, X., Yang, Y., Xu, L., Ding, Y., Yan, T., Li, Q., 2024. Environmental damages, cumulative exergy demand, and economic assessment of Panus giganteus farming with the application of solar technology. Sci. Total Environ. 907, 168020.
Cochran, W.G., 1977. The estimation of sample size. Sampl. Tech. 3, 72–90.
Elyasi, S.N., Marami, H., He, L., Kaab, A., Pan, J., Liu, H., Khoshnevisan, B., 2022. Up and Downstream Technologies of Anaerobic Digestion from Life Cycle Assessment Perspective 361–389.
Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Kaab, A., Rafiee, S., 2020. Application of life cycle analysis to assess environmental sustainability of wheat cultivation in the west of Iran. Energy 193, 116768.
Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Sharifi, M., Taherzadeh-Shalmaei, N., Afrasiabi, S., 2022. A new method for green forage production: Energy use efficiency and environmental sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 363, 132562.
Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Khanali, M., Ghahderijani, M., Chau, K. W., 2018. Application of data envelopment analysis approach for optimization of energy use and reduction of greenhouse gas emission in peanut production of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1327-1335.
IPCC, 2006. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. 2. Inst. Glob. Environ. Strateg. Hayama, Japan.
Kaab, A., Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Sharifi, M., 2023. A study of changes in energy consumption trend and environmental indicators in the production of agricultural crops using a life cycle assessment approach in the years 2018-2022. Iran. J. Biosyst. Eng. 54, 1–18.
Kaab, A., Sharifi, M., Mobli, H., 2020. Life Cycle Assessment and Estimation of Environmental Pollutants Emission in Sugarcane Production (Saccharum officinarum L.) using Artificial Neural Network. J. Agroecol. 12, 87–106.
Kaab, A., Sharifi, M., Mobli, H., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Chau, K., 2019. Use of optimization techniques for energy use efficiency and environmental life cycle assessment modification in sugarcane production. Energy 181, 1298–1320.
Kazemi, N., Gholami Parashkoohi, M., Mohammadi, A., Mohammad Zamani, D., 2023. Environmental life cycle assessment and energy-economic analysis in different cultivation of microalgae-based optimization method. Results Eng. 19, 101240.
Khalaj, M., Gholami Parashkoohi, M., Mohammad Zamani, D., 2023. Use of life cycle assessment and modeling techniques for prediction of energy-environmental indicators in different wheat production systems. Environ. Sustain. Indic. 18, 100237.
Khanali, M., Akram, A., Behzadi, J., Mostashari-Rad, F., Saber, Z., Chau, K. wing, Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., 2021. Multi-objective optimization of energy use and environmental emissions for walnut production using imperialist competitive algorithm. Appl. Energy 284, 116342.
Litskas, V.D., Irakleous, T., Tzortzakis, N., Stavrinides, M.C., 2017. Determining the carbon footprint of indigenous and introduced grape varieties through Life Cycle Assessment using the island of Cyprus as a case study. J. Clean. Prod. 156, 418–425.
Lyche Solheim, A., Globevnik, L., Austnes, K., Kristensen, P., Moe, S.J., Persson, J., Phillips, G., Poikane, S., van de Bund, W., Birk, S., 2019. A new broad typology for rivers and lakes in Europe: Development and application for large-scale environmental assessments. Sci. Total Environ. 697, 134043.
Maysami, M. 2013. Energy Efficiency in Dairy Cattle Farming and related Feed Production in Iran. https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/17583/maysami.pdf?sequence=1.
Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture of Iran, 2021. Annual Agricultural Statistics. www.maj.ir (in Persian).
Mohammadi Kashka, F., Tahmasebi Sarvestani, Z., Pirdashti, H., Motevali, A., Nadi, M., Valipour, M., 2023. Sustainable Systems Engineering Using Life Cycle Assessment: Application of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Agro-Environmental Footprint. Sustain. 2023, Vol. 15, Page 6326 15, 6326.
Molaee Jafrodi, H., Gholami Parashkoohi, M., Afshari, H., Mohammad Zamani, D., 2022. Comparative life cycle cost-energy and cumulative exergy demand of paddy production under different cultivation scenarios: A case study. Ecol. Indic. 144, 109507.
Mostashari-Rad, F., Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Taki, M., Ghahderijani, M., Kaab, A., Chau, K. wing, Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., 2021. Exergoenvironmental damages assessment of horticultural crops using ReCiPe2016 and cumulative exergy demand frameworks. J. Clean. Prod. 278, 123788.
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Abdi, R., Rafiee, S., 2013. Energy use pattern and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs and economical models for peanut production in Iran. Int. J. Agric. Crop Sci. 5, 2102–2193.
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Azadi, H., Van Passel, S., Saber, Z., Hosseini-Fashami, F., Mostashari-Rad, F., Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., 2021. Prospects of solar systems in production chain of sunflower oil using cold press method with concentrating energy and life cycle assessment. Energy 223, 120117.
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Kaab, A., Hosseini-Fashami, F., Mostashari-Rad, F., Kwok-Wing, C., 2019a. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Approach to Evaluate Different Waste Management Opportunities, in: Advances in Waste-to-Energy Technologies. CRC Press, pp. 195–216.
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Rafiee, S., Mohtasebi, S.S., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Chau, K. wing, 2019b. Comprehensive model of energy, environmental impacts and economic in rice milling factories by coupling adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and life cycle assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 217, 742–756.
Nikkhah, A., Khojastehpour, M., Emadi, B., Taheri-Rad, A., Khorramdel, S., 2015. Environmental impacts of peanut production system using life cycle assessment methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, 84-90.
Ordikhani, H., Parashkoohi, M.G., Zamani, D.M., Ghahderijani, M., 2021. Energy-environmental life cycle assessment and cumulative exergy demand analysis for horticultural crops (Case study: Qazvin province). Energy Reports 7, 2899–2915.
Point, E., Tyedmers, P., Naugler, C., 2012. Life cycle environmental impacts of wine production and consumption in Nova Scotia, Canada. J. Clean. Prod. 27, 11–20.
Ruparathna, R., Hewage, K., Sadiq, R., 2016. Improving the energy efficiency of the existing building stock: A critical review of commercial and institutional buildings. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 53, 1032–1045.
Savelli, I., Morstyn, T., 2021. Better together: Harnessing social relationships in smart energy communities. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 78, 102125.
Shiv Kumar Lohan, Navjot Singh Brar, Ajaib Singh, Ritu Dogra, Anoop Kumar Dixit, Urmila Gupta Phutela, Nilesh Biwalkar, Mohammed Javed, 2023. Energy Input-Output Analyses of Major Field Vegetable Crops Production in Punjab. J. Agric. Eng. 60, 109–125.
Simpeh, E.K., Pillay, J.P.G., Ndihokubwayo, R., Nalumu, D.J., 2022. Improving energy efficiency of HVAC systems in buildings: a review of best practices. Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. 40, 165–182.
Singh, R.K., Murty, H.R., Gupta, S.K., Dikshit, A.K., 2012. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol. Indic. 15, 281–299.
Soam, S., Borjesson, P., Sharma, P.K., Gupta, R.P., Tuli, D.K., Kumar, R., 2017. Life cycle assessment of rice straw utilization practices in India. Bioresour. Technol. 228, 89–98.
Steenwerth, K.L., Strong, E.B., Greenhut, R.F., Williams, L., Kendall, A., 2015. Life cycle greenhouse gas, energy, and water assessment of wine grape production in California. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 20, 1243–1253.
Taherzadeh-Shalmaei, N., Rafiee, M., Kaab, A., Khanali, M., Vaziri Rad, M.A., Kasaeian, A., 2023. Energy audit and management of environmental GHG emissions based on multi-objective genetic algorithm and data envelopment analysis: An agriculture case. Energy Reports 10, 1507–1520.
Taherzadeh-Shalmaei, N., Sharifi, M., Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Kaab, A., 2021. Evaluating the energy use, economic and environmental sustainability for smoked fish production from life cycle assessment point of view (case study: Guilan Province, Iran). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 1–14.
Tahmasebi Boldaji, R., Ghazanfari, S., Rajabi Kuyakhi, H., Tahmasebi Boldaji, N., Torki, M., 2023. Experimental investigation of ultrasonic cycle/magnetic stirrer (UC/MS) effect on water/α -Al2O3 nanofluid stability and thermal conductivity and its ANFIS/PSO modeling. Results Eng. 19, 101284.
 
مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی
دوره 9، شماره 1
فروردین 1403
صفحه 25-39

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 28 دی 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 20 اردیبهشت 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 26 اردیبهشت 1403

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار