تحلیل مقایسه ای استفاده از انرژی و پیامدهای زیست محیطی در طول چرخه زندگی کشت یونجه و جو سیلوی در روش های مختلف آبیاری

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی مهندسی بیوسیستم دانشگاه آزاد واحد تاکستان

2 گروه مهندسی مهندسی بیوسیستم دانشگاه آزاد تاکستان

3 گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم دانشگاه آزاد واحد تاکستان

چکیده

هدف از این مطالعه بررسی کارایی انرژی و پیامدهای زیست‌محیطی تولید یونجه و جو سیلو در استان قزوین تحت سیستم‌های مختلف آبیاری بود. نتایج نشان داد که آبیاری زیرسطحی از کل انرژی ورودی 95667.71 مگاژول در هکتار استفاده کرد، در حالی که آبیاری سطحی با انرژی ورودی 902683.07 مگاژول در هکتار تأثیر مثبتی بر تولید یونجه داشت. آبیاری غرقابی با 39/110973 مگاژول در هکتار بیشترین انرژی ورودی و کمترین انرژی خروجی را با 31/523644 مگاژول در هکتار نسبت به سایر روش‌های آبیاری جو داشت. عوامل اصلی انتشار در مزرعه سوخت دیزل و کودهای شیمیایی بودند، اما سیستم‌های آبیاری زیرسطحی به دلیل کاهش مصرف، سطوح پایین‌تری از آلاینده‌های مربوط به سوخت دیزل داشتند، در حالی که سیستم‌های آبیاری غرقابی دارای سطوح بالاتری از این آلاینده‌ها بودند. بر اساس یافته‌ها، کشت جو سیلوی از نظر مصرف انرژی و محیطی گزینه بهتری نسبت به کشت یونجه بود.در حالی که سیستم‌های آبیاری غرقابی دارای سطوح بالاتری از این آلاینده‌ها بودند. بر اساس یافته‌ها، کشت جو سیلوی از نظر مصرف انرژی و محیطی گزینه بهتری نسبت به کشت یونجه بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparative analysis of energy utilization and environmental consequences throughout the life cycle of alfalfa and silage barley cultivation in different irrigation techniques

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi 1
  • Kamal Nuraeefara 2
  • Davood Mohammad Zamani 3
1 Department of Biosystem Engineering, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran.
2 Department of Biosystem Engineering, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran.
3 Department of Biosystem Engineering, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The objective of this study was to evaluate the energy efficiency and environmental ramifications of alfalfa and silage barley production in Qazvin province, Iran, under different irrigation systems. The outcomes showed that subsurface irrigation utilized a total input energy of 95667.71 MJ ha-1, whereas surface irrigation had a positive impact on alfalfa production with a total input energy of 902683.07 MJ ha-1. Flood irrigation had the highest input energy of 110973.39 MJ ha-1 and the lowest output energy of 523644.31 MJ ha-1 compared to other irrigation methods for barley. The primary contributors to On-Farm emissions were diesel fuel and chemical fertilizers, but subsurface irrigation systems had lower levels of diesel fuel related pollutants due to reduced usage, while flooding irrigation systems had higher levels of such contaminants. Based on the finding, silage barley cultivation was a better option than alfalfa cultivation in terms of energy consumption and environment. Based on the finding, silage barley cultivation was a better option than alfalfa cultivation in terms of energy consumption and environment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Energy
  • Environmental impacts
  • Irrigation
  • Life cycle assessment
Abdi, R., Hematian, A., Ghasemi, H., Shahamat, E.Z., 2012. Sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for maize production system in Kermanshah province of Iran. Int. J. Plant, Anim. Environ. Sci. 2, 84–90.
Ali, Q., Khan, M., Research, M.K.-A. in E., 2017, U., 2017. Impact of energy efficiency improvement on greenhouse gas in off-season tomato farming: Evidence from Punjab, Pakistan. techno-press.org 5, 207–217.
Azizpanah, A., Fathi, R., Taki, M., 2023. Eco-energy and environmental evaluation of cantaloupe production by life cycle assessment method. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 1854–1870.
Bosco, S., Bene, C. Di, Galli, M., Remorini, D., Massai, R., Bonari, E., 2011. Greenhouse gas emissions in the agricultural phase of wine production in the Maremma rural district in Tuscany, Italy. Ital. J. Agron. 6, e15–e15.
Cochran, W.G., 1977. The estimation of sample size. Sampl. Tech. 3, 72–90.
Elyasi, S. N., Marami, H., He, L., Kaab, A., Pan, J., Liu, H.,  Khoshnevisan, B., 2022. Up and downstream technologies of anaerobic digestion from life cycle assessment perspective. Renewable Energy Technologies for Energy Efficient Sustainable Development, 361-389.
Ghorbani, R., Mondani, F., Amirmoradi, S., Feizi, H., Khorramdel, S., Teimouri, M., Sanjani, S., Anvarkhah, S., Aghel, H., 2011. A case study of energy use and economical analysis of irrigated and dryland wheat production systems. Appl. Energy 88, 283–288.
Henderson, A.D., Asselin-Balençon, A., Heller, M.C., Burek, J., Kim, D., Lessard, L., Margni, M., Saad, R., Matlock, M.D., Thoma, G., Wang, Y., Jolliet, O., 2023. Spatialized Life Cycle Assessment of Fluid Milk Production and Consumption in the United States. Sustain. 15, 1890.
Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Tabatabaei, M., Aghbashlo, M., Khanali, M., Demirbas, A., 2018. A comprehensive review on the environmental impacts of diesel/biodiesel additives. Energy Convers. Manag. 174, 579–614.
IPCC, 2006. Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. 2. Inst. Glob. Environ. Strateg. Hayama, Japan.
ISO, 2006. 14040 International standard. Environmental Management–Life Cycle Assessment–Principles and Framework, International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kaab, A., Sharifi, M., Mobli, H., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Chau, K., 2019. Use of optimization techniques for energy use efficiency and environmental life cycle assessment modification in sugarcane production. Energy 181, 1298–1320.
Kaab, A., Sharifi, M., Moradi, H., 2021. Analysis of energy indicators and environmental impacts of dryland cantaloupe production with life cycle assessment approach (case study: ilam). Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 11(2), 491-504.
Kamran, M., Yan, Z., Chang, S., Chen, X., Ahmad, I., Jia, Q., Ghani, M.U., Nouman, M., Hou, F., 2022. Enhancing resource use efficiency of alfalfa with appropriate irrigation and fertilization strategy mitigate greenhouse gases emissions in the arid region of Northwest China. F. Crop. Res. 289, 108715.
Kitani, O., 1999. CIGR Handbook of Agricultural Engineering: Plant production engineering. American Society of Agricultural & Biological Engineers.
Lee, C.C., Hussain, J., Chen, Y., 2022. The optimal behavior of renewable energy resources and government’s energy consumption subsidy design from the perspective of green technology implementation. Renew. Energy 195, 670–680.
Litskas, V.D., Irakleous, T., Tzortzakis, N., Stavrinides, M.C., 2017. Determining the carbon footprint of indigenous and introduced grape varieties through Life Cycle Assessment using the island of Cyprus as a case study. J. Clean. Prod. 156, 418–425.
Mawof, A., Prasher, S.O., Bayen, S., Anderson, E.C., Nzediegwu, C., Patel, R., 2022. Barley Straw Biochar and Compost Affect Heavy Metal Transport in Soil and Uptake by Potatoes Grown under Wastewater Irrigation. Sustain. 2022, Vol. 14, Page 5665 14, 5665.
Mostashari-Rad, F., Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Taki, M., Ghahderijani, M., Kaab, A., Chau, K. wing, Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., 2021. Exergoenvironmental damages assessment of horticultural crops using ReCiPe2016 and cumulative exergy demand frameworks. J. Clean. Prod. 278, 123788.
Nunes, F.A., Seferin, M., Maciel, V.G., Ayub, M.A.Z., 2017. Life Cycle Assessment comparison between brow parboiled rice produced under organic and minimal tillage cultivation systems. J. Clean. Prod. 161, 95–104.
Omid, M., Khanali, M., Zand, S., 2018. Energy analysis and greenhouse gas emission in broiler farms: A case study in Alborz province, Iran. Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR J. 19, 83–90.
Pardo, J.J., Domínguez, A., Léllis, B.C., Montoya, F., Tarjuelo, J.M., Martínez-Romero, A., 2022. Effect of the optimized regulated deficit irrigation methodology on quality, profitability and sustainability of barley in water scarce areas. Agric. Water Manag. 266, 107573.
Point, E., Tyedmers, P., Naugler, C., 2012. Life cycle environmental impacts of wine production and consumption in Nova Scotia, Canada. J. Clean. Prod. 27, 11–20.
Qaoud, H.A., Shtaya, M., Mizyed, N., Al-Fares, H., Lebdi, A., 2022. Effect of Short-term Irrigation of Treated Wastewater on Vetch (Vicia sativa L.) and Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Growth. Legum. Res. 45, 626–630.
Qi, W., Xiang, R., Xingyang, S., Guangrong, H., Enhe, Z., Heling, W., Vance, M.M., 2015. The optimum ridge-furrow ratio and suitable ridge-covering material in rainwater harvesting for oats production in semiarid regions of China. F. Crop. Res.
Rajendran, N., Han, J., 2023. Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of poly (butylene succinate) production using food waste. Waste Manag. 156, 168–176.
Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg, T., Schmidt, W.-P., Suh, S., Weidema, B.P., Pennington, D.W., 2004. Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ. Int. 30, 701–720.
Rogers, C.W., Dari, B., Neibling, H., Walling, J., 2022. Barley yield and malt characteristics as affected by nitrogen and final irrigation timing. Agron. J. 114, 1461–1474.
Roy, P., Ijiri, T., Nei, D., Orikasa, T., Okadome, H., Nakamura, N., Shiina, T., 2009. Life cycle inventory (LCI) of different forms of rice consumed in households in Japan. J. Food Eng. 91, 49–55.
Saber, Z., Esmaeili, M., Pirdashti, H., Motevali, A., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., 2020. Exergoenvironmental-Life cycle cost analysis for conventional, low external input and organic systems of rice paddy production. J. Clean. Prod. 263, 121529.
Sefeedpari, P., Rafiee, S., Akram, A., Komleh, S.H.P., 2014. Modeling output energy based on fossil fuels and electricity energy consumption on dairy farms of Iran: Application of adaptive neural-fuzzy inference system technique. Comput. Electron. Agric. 109, 80–85.
Soltani, S., Mosavi, S.H., Saghaian, S.H., Azhdari, S., Alamdarlo, H.N., Khalilian, S., 2023. Climate change and energy use efficiency in arid and semiarid agricultural areas: A case study of Hamadan-Bahar plain in Iran. Energy 268, 126553.
Steenwerth, K.L., Strong, E.B., Greenhut, R.F., Williams, L., Kendall, A., 2015. Life cycle greenhouse gas, energy, and water assessment of wine grape production in California. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 20, 1243–1253.
Talukder, B., vanLoon, G.W., Hipel, K.W., 2019. Energy efficiency of agricultural systems in the southwest coastal zone of Bangladesh. Ecol. Indic. 98, 641–648.
Taherzadeh-Shalmaei, N., Rafiee, M., Kaab, A., Khanali, M., Rad, M. A. V., Kasaeian, A., 2023. Energy audit and management of environmental GHG emissions based on multi-objective genetic algorithm and data envelopment analysis: An agriculture case. Energy Reports, 10, 1507-1520.
Zhang, J., Liu, H.X., Wei, X.X., Guo, Z.G., 2023. Effect of partial root-zone drying irrigation (PRDI) on alfalfa available soil P. 1–14.