ارزیابی و طراحی شبکه زنجیره تأمین لجستیک پیشرو-معکوس نیروگاه بیوگاز شیراز

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه مهندسی ماشین‌های کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشکدگان کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران

2 گروه مهندسی ماشین های کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشکدگان کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران

3 گروه مهندسی ماشین های کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشکدگان کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

چکیده

از آغاز قرن بیست و یکم حدود 80 درصد انرژی جهان از سوخت‌های فسیلی تأمین می‌شود. مشکلات ناشی از آلاینده‌های زیست‌محیطی حاصل از مصرف سوخت‌های فسیلی و کاهش ذخایر سوخت‌های فسیلی، توجه زیادی را به منابع انرژی تجدیدپذیر و سایر منابع انرژی کم‌کربن و ارزان، برای تولید برق جلب کرده‌است. به‌همین دلیل، در این مقاله به بررسی نیروگاه بیوگاز شیراز پرداخته شده‌است. در این مطالعه به‌منظور بررسی اقتصادی و زیست محیطی نیروگاه بیوگاز زباله‌سوز شیراز، از لجستیک معکوس‌-پیشرو توسط نرم‌افزار GAMS بهره گرفته شده که محصولات از سطوح پایینی زنجیره‌تأمین به سطوح بالاتر بازگردانده می‌شوند و به دلیل کاهش هزینه‌ها، افزایش سود، بالا بردن رضایت‌مندی مشتریان و رعایت قوانین زیست‌محیطی اهمیت بالایی دارد. نتایج نشان داد که متان تئوری تولید شده از فرآیند هضم 35/27 درصد و ارزش حرارتی بالا و پایین بیوگاز به ترتیب 32/22 و 11/20 مگاژول بر مترمکعب می-باشد. به ازای 18 مولد با دبی جرمی ورودی هر مولد 57/888 کیلوگرم در روز و زمان ماند 57/9 روز، بیوگاز تولید شده 326/3949 مترمکعب بر روز خواهد بود که توان به دست آمده با فرض توان بالا و پایین ارزش حرارتی سوخت در نیروگاه 09/357 و 809/321 کیلووات خواهد بود. نتایج حاصل از بررسی توابع هدف نشان داد که هرچه میزان تابع اقتصادی بیشتر می‌شود، سود زنجیره بیشتر شده، مقدار تابع زیست‌محیطی نیز بیشتر می‌شود. از آنجایی که تابع زیست‌محیطی از نوع کمینه‌سازی است، افزایش آن به معنی بدتر شدن آن است که جهت بهینه‌سازی این امر می‌توان از مولدهای ترکیبی چندمرحله‌ای به جای مولدهای تک‌مرحله‌ای استفاده کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation and design of forward-reverse logistics supply chain network of Shiraz biogas power plant

نویسندگان [English]

  • Najme Tavakoli 1
  • Mohammad Sharifi 2
  • Majid Khanali 3
  • Hassan Ghasemi-Mobtaker 3
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
2 Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
3 Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Since the beginning of the 21st century, about 80% of the world's energy is supplied by fossil fuels. The problems caused by the environmental pollutants resulting from the consumption of fossil fuels and the reduction of fossil fuel reserves have drawn a lot of attention to renewable energy sources and other low-carbon and cheap energy sources for electricity generation. For this reason, in this article, Shiraz biogas power plant has been investigated. In this study, in order to investigate the economic and environmental aspects of the Shiraz waste incinerator biogas plant, reverse-forward logistics was used by GAMS software, where the products from the lower levels of the supply chain are returned to the higher levels and due to cost reduction Increasing profits, increasing customer satisfaction and complying with environmental laws are very important. The results showed that the theoretical methane produced from the digestion process is 27.35% and the high and low calorific value of biogas is 22.32 and 20.11 megajoules per cubic meter, respectively. For 18 generators with an input mass flow rate of each generator of 888.57 kg per day and a residence time of 9.57 days, the biogas produced will be 3949.326 cubic meters per day, the power obtained assuming high power and low calorific value of the fuel in The power plant will be 357/09 and 321/809 kW. The results of the examination of the economic and environmental function showed that as the amount of the economic objective function increases, the profit of the chain increases,

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • biogas
  • municipal solid waste
  • fossil fuel
  • forward-reverse logistics
Abed, R., Ashley, P., Duane, B., Crotty, J. and Lyne, A. (2023). An environmental impact study of inter‐dental cleaning aids. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 50(1), pp.2-10.
Acaroglu, M. (1998). Energy from biomass, & applications. University of Seluck, Graduate School of Natural & Applied Sciences. Textbook.
Ahmadbeyki, A., Ghahderijani, M., Borghaee, A. and Bakhoda, H. (2023). Energy use and environmental impacts analysis of greenhouse crops production using life cycle assessment approach: A case study of cucumber and tomato from Tehran province, Iran. Energy Reports, 9, pp.988-999.
An, X., Li, Z., Zude-Sasse, M., Tchuenbou-Magaia, F. and Yang, Y. (2020). Characterization of textural failure mechanics of strawberry fruit. Journal of Food Engineering, 10016.
Anton, A., Torrellas, M., Nunez, M., Sevigne, E., Amores, M. J., Munoz, P., J. Montero, I. (2014). Improvement of Agricultural Life Cycle Assessment Studies through Spatial Differentiation and New Impact Categories: Case Study on Greenhouse Tomato Production. Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 9454-9462.
Asakereh, A., Kiani, M.K.D. and Soleymani, M. (2023). Sustainability assessment of sugarcane and sugar beet production systems by energy and exergy approaches: a case study. International Journal of Exergy, 40(1), pp.74-90.
Asgharipour, M. R., Shahgholi, H., Campbell, D. E., Khamari, I., & Ghadiri, A. (2019). Comparison of the sustainability of bean production systems based on emergy and economic analyses. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191, 1–21.
Asgharipour, M.R., Amiri, Z. and Campbell, D.E. (2020). Evaluation of the sustainability of four greenhouse vegetable production ecosystems based on an analysis of emergy and social characteristics”. Ecological Modelling, 424, p.109021.
Bekchanov, M. and Mirzabaev, A. (2018). Circular economy of composting in Sri Lanka: Opportunities and challenges for reducing waste related pollution and improving soil health. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, pp.1107-1119.
Benis, K. and Ferrão, P. (2017). Potential mitigation of the environmental impacts of food systems through urban and peri-urban agriculture (UPA)–a life cycle assessment approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp.784-795.
Brandt-Williams, S. L. (2002). Handbook of emergy evaluation: a compendium of data for emergy computation issued in a series of Folios. Center for Environmental Policy Environmental Engineering Science. University of Floriga, Gainesville.
Campbell, D.E., Brandt-Williams, S.L., and Meisch, M.E.A. (2005). Environmental Accounting Using Emergy: Evaluation of the State of West Virginia. EPA/600/R-02/011. USEPA. Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, pp. 116.
Canakci, M. and Akinci, I. (2006). Energy use pattern analyses of greenhouse vegetable production. Energy, 31, 1243–1256.
Cochran, W.G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons
Cohen, A., Malone, S., Morris, Z., Weissburg, M. and Bras, B. (2018). Combined fish and lettuce cultivation: an aquaponics life cycle assessment. Procedia Cirp, 69, pp.551-556.
FAO, (2020). Food and Agricultural Organization. www.fao.org.
Fatemi, S. H., Babapour, A., Nowrozi Sarmi, D., Heydarzadeh S., Sharifi M. (2022). A new look at the use of renewable energy in agricultural industries. Two quarterly renewable and new energies, 9(1), pp.29-39
Gołasa, P., Wysokiński, M., Bieńkowska-Gołasa, W., Gradziuk, P., Golonko, M., Gradziuk, B., Siedlecka, A. and Gromada, A. (2021). Sources of greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture, with particular emphasis on emissions from energy used. Energies, 14(13), p.3784.
Gorjian, S., Calise, F., Kant, K., Ahamed, M.S., Copertaro, B., Najafi, G., Zhang, X., Aghaei, M. and Shamshiri, R.R. (2021). A review on opportunities for implementation of solar energy technologies in agricultural greenhouses. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, p.124807.
Hatirli, S.A., Ozkan, B., and Fert. C. (2006). Energy inputs & crop yield relationship in greenhouse tomato production. Renewable Energy, 31, 427– 438.
Ilari, A., Toscano, G., Boakye-Yiadom, K.A., Duca, D. and Foppa Pedretti, E. (2021). Life cycle assessment of protected strawberry productions in central Italy. Sustainability, 13(9), p.4879.
Imanthi, K.P.A., Madusanka, D.A.T., Pathmalal, M.M. and Idroos, F.S. (2023). Emerging trends of cyanobacteria-based microbial fuel cells as an alternative energy source. Development in Wastewater Treatment Research and Processes, pp.99-119.
ISO. (2006) 14040 International standards. Environmental Management–Life Cycle Assessment–Principles and Framework, International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jekayinfa, S.O., Adeleke, K.M., Ogunlade, C.A., Sasanya, B.F. and Azeez, N.A. (2022). Energy and exergy analysis of Soybean production and processing system. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 10, p.100540.
Kaab A, Sharifi M, Mobli H, Nabavi-Pelesaraei A, Chau K. (2019). Combined life cycle assessment and artificial intelligence for prediction of output energy and environmental impacts of sugarcane production. Sci Total Environ. 664,1005–19.
Kastratović, R. (2019). Impact of foreign direct investment on greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture of developing countries. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 63(3), pp.620-642.
Kazemi, H.and Zardari, S. (2020). Energy Analysis and Greenhouse Gas Emission from Strawberry Production under Two Irrigation Systems. Walailak Journal of Science and Technology (WJST), 17(1), pp.1-10.
Khan, F.A.A. (2018). A review on hydroponic greenhouse cultivation for sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, 2(2), 59-66.
Kitani, O. (1999). Energy & Biomass Engineering. CIGR Handbook of Agricultural Engineering. Vol. (V), St Joseph, MI: ASAE.
Kohkan, S., Ghanbari, A., Asgharipour, M., Fakheri, B. (2017). Emergy analysis of Yaquti grape cultivation system in Sistan. Arid Biome Scientific and Research Journal. 7 (2), 29-37.
Lan, Q., Chapman, R. S., Schreinemachers, D. M., Tian, L., and He, X. (2002). Household stove improvement and risk of lung cancer in Xuanwei, China. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 94(11), 826-835.
Lotfi, B., Maleki, A., Mirzaei Heydari, M., Rostaminiya, M., and Babaei, F. (2021). The Effect of Different Tillage Systems, Nitrogen Fertilizer and Mycorrhiza on Mung Bean (Vigna radiata) Production and Energy Indices. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 52(4), 416-428.
Lu, G., Ocola, L. E., and Chen, J. (2009). Reduced graphene oxide for room-temperature gas sensors. Nanotechnology, 20(44), 445502.
Lyu, Y., Raugei, M., Zhang, X., Mellino, S. and Ulgiati, S. (2021). Environmental cost and impacts of chemicals used in agriculture: An integration of emergy and Life Cycle Assessment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 151, p.111604.
Mafakheri, S., Veisi, H., Noori, O. and Mahdavi Damghani, A. (2017). Environmental Impact Assessment of Strawberry Production in Two Conventional and 0rganic Production Systems: (Case Study: Kurdistan Province). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 27(2), pp.197-208.
Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture of Iran. (2020). Annual Agricultural Statistics. www.maj.ir (in Persian).
Mofatah, S. (2018). Studying the energy, economic and environmental indicators of Mohammadi flower production with a life cycle assessment approach. Master's thesis in the field of Agricultur Mechanization-Energy Engineering, University of Tehran.
Mohammadi-Kashka, F., Pirdashti, H., Tahmasebi-Sarvestani, Z., Motevali, A., Nadi, M. and Aghaeipour, N. (2023). Integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) with boundary line analysis (BLA) to reduce agro-environmental risk of crop production: a case study of soybean production in Northern Iran. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, pp.1-20.
Nemecek, T., Kägi, T., and Blaser, S. (2007). Life cycle inventories of agricultural production systems. Final report ecoinvent v2. 0 No, 15.
Nieuwkoop, P., van, N., van der Velden, A. Verhaegh, P., and van Nieuwkoop. P. (1998) Energy consumption in greenhouses. Mededeling Landbouw Economisch Instituut, No. 624, pp 41.
Odum, H. T. (1996). Environmental accounting: emergy and environmental decision making. (No Title).
Odum, H. T., Brown, M. T., & Brandt-Williams, S. (2000). Handbook of emergy evaluation Folio 1: Introduction and global budget. Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, 16.
Pierrat, E., Barbarossa, V., Núñez, M., Scherer, L., Link, A., Damiani, M., Verones, F. and Dorber, M. (2023). Global water consumption impacts on riverine fish species richness in Life Cycle Assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 854, p.158702.
Pulselli, R.M., Simoncini, E., and Marchettini, N. (2009). Energy and emergy based cost–benefit evaluation of building envelopes relative to geographical location and climate. Build. Environ. 44 (5), 920–928.
Pulselli, R.M., Simoncini, E., Ridolfi, R., and Bastianoni, S. (2007). Specific emergy of cement and concrete: an energy-based appraisal of building materials and their transport. Ecol. Indic. 8, 647–856.
Rahmani, H. and Mohamadi, G.E. (2018). Effect of Endophytic Fungi Pirifomospora indica on Flowering and Root Growth Parameters of Strawberry in Hydroponic Culture. Journal of horticulture science (Agriculture sciences and tecnology),32(2), 39-49.
Rivera, X.C.S., Bacenetti, J., Fusi, A. and Niero, M. (2017). The influence of fertiliser and pesticide emissions model on life cycle assessment of agricultural products: the case of Danish and Italian barley. Science of the Total Environment, 592, pp.745-757.
Rosa, A.D., Siracusa, G., and Cavallaro, R. (2018). Emergy evaluation of Sicilian red orange production. A comparisonbetween organic and conventional farming. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16: 1907-1914.
Salehpour, T, Khanali, M, and Rajabipour, A. (2020). Investigating environmental effects and evaluating energy flow in greenhouse primrose production with the approach of cumulative energy demand and cumulative exergy demand. Biosystem Engineering Journal of Iran. 50(4): 771-785 (In Persian with English Summary)
Sanjaya, E. and Abbas, A. (2023). Plasma gasification as an alternative energy-from-waste (EFW) technology for the circular economy: An environmental review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 189, p.106730.
Sharma, G.D., Shah, M.I., Shahzad, U., Jain, M. and Chopra, R. (2021). Exploring the nexus between agriculture and greenhouse gas emissions in BIMSTEC region: The role of renewable energy and human capital as moderators. Journal of Environmental Management, 297, p.113316.
Singh, S., Verma, S.R., and Mittal, J.P. (1997) Energy requirements for production of major crops in India. Agric mechanization Asia, Africa & Latin America 28(4), 13–17.
Skunca, D., Tomasevic, I., Nastasijevic, I., Tomovic, V. and Djekic, I. (2018). Life cycle assessment of the chicken meat chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, pp.440-450.
Svanes, E. and Johnsen, F.M. (2019). Environmental life cycle assessment of production, processing, distribution and consumption of apples, sweet cherries and plums from conventional agriculture in Norway. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, p.117773.
Tabatabaie S.M.H. and Murthy G.S. (2016). Cradle to farm gate life cycle assessment of strawberry production in the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1-7.
Tan, H., Li, Z., Wang, Q. and Mohamed, M.A. (2023). A novel forecast scenario-based robust energy management method for integrated rural energy systems with greenhouses. Applied Energy, 330, p.120343.
Tang, Y., Dong, J., Li, G., Zheng, Y., Chi, Y., Nzihou, A., Weiss-Hortala, E. and Ye, C. (2020). Environmental and exergetic life cycle assessment of incineration-and gasification-based waste to energy systems in China. Energy, 205, p.118002.
Tricase, C., Lamonaca, E., Ingrao, C., Bacenetti, J. and Giudice, A.L. (2018). A comparative Life Cycle Assessment between organic and conventional barley cultivation for sustainable agriculture pathways. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, pp.3747-3759.
Van der Werf, H.M., Knudsen, M.T. and Cederberg, C. (2020). Towards better representation of organic agriculture in life cycle assessment. Nature Sustainability, 3(6), pp.419-425.
Wang, J., Hou, D., Liu, Z., Tao, J., Yan, B., Liu, Z., Yang, T., Su, H., Tahir, M.H. and Chen, G. (2022). Emergy analysis of agricultural waste biomass for energy-oriented utilization in China: Current situation and perspectives. Science of The Total Environment, p.157798.
Yang, T. and Kim, H.J. (2020). Comparisons of nitrogen and phosphorus mass balance for tomato-, basil-, and lettuce-based aquaponic and hydroponic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, p.122619.
Zhang, L.X., Song, B., and Chen, B. (2012). Emergy-based analysis of four farming systems: insight into agricultural diversification in rural China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 28: 33-44.
Khammayom, N., Maruyama, N., Chaichana, C. and Hirota, M., (2022). Impact of environmental factors on energy balance of greenhouse for strawberry cultivation. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 33, p.101945.