ارزیابی روش‌های مکانیزه و سنتی برداشت کنجد در شمال استان خوزستان

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم- دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

2 گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

3 گروه مهندسی تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

چکیده

برداشت کنجد به دلیل استفاده از ارقام شکوفا و ریزش بسیار زیاد در برداشت مستقیم و مکانیزه، عمدتا به صورت دستی انجام می‌شود. در سالهای اخیر معرفی ارقام ناشکوفا امکان برداشت مکانیزه کنجد را فراهم کرده است. در این مطالعه روش سنتی (ارقام شکوفا) و مکانیزه (ارقام ناشکوفا) برداشت کنجد از نظر میزان تلفات دانه، هزینه، انرژی مصرفی و زمان مورد نیاز برای برداشت بررسی گردید. داده‌های برداشت سنتی از کشاورزان شهرستان دزفول، شوش و اندیمشک و دادههای برداشت مکانیزه از کشت و صنعت شهید رجایی دزفول جمعآوری شد. در برداشت مکانیزه، میزان تلفات کمباین در سه مقدار کشت بذر 5، 10 و 12 کیلوگرم در هکتار و سه سرعت پیشروی کمباین 5/1، 2 و 5/2 کیلومتر در ساعت اندازه‌گیری شد. میانگین تلفات دماغه 83/4 درصد به دست آمد که بیش از 94 درصد آن مربوط به افت دماغه کمباین بود. یافتهها نشان داد با افزایش تراکم بوته میزان افت کمباین به شدت کاهش می‌یابد. میانگین نیروی انسانی در برداشت یک هکتار کنجد ناشکوفا 315 نفر- ساعت به دست آمد که 98 برابر روش مکانیزه بود. میانگین هزینه برداشت هر هکتار کنجد بر اساس سال 1399 در روش سنتی و مکانیزه به ترتیب 4/49 و 7/2 میلیون ریال محاسبه شد. میانگین کل انرژی مصرفی برداشت هر هکتار کنجد در روش سنتی و مکانیزه به ترتیب 2088 و 1510 مگاژول به دست آمد که انرژی انسانی در روش سنتی بخش عمده آن بود. نتایج نشان داد استفاده از ارقام ناشکوفا و برداشت مکانیزه امکان توسعه کشت کنجد را فراهم می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of mechanized and traditional harvesting methods of sesame in the north of Khuzestan province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Hosein Noorani 1
  • Abbas Asakereh 2
  • Mohammad Reza Siahpoosh 3
1 Department of Biosystems Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran
2 Department of Biosystems, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Faculty of Agriculture,, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Sesame harvesting is mainly done manually due to the use of dehiscence cultivars and high seed loss in mechanized harvesting. In recent years, with the introduction of non-dehiscence cultivars, the mechanized harvesting of sesame has become possible. In this study, the traditional and mechanized methods of sesame harvesting were investigated in terms of seed loss, cost, energy consumption and time required for harvesting. Data of traditional system were collected from farmers in Dezful, Shush and Andimeshk counties and data of mechanized system were obtained from Shahid Rajaei Agricultural production Company in Dezful. In the mechanized harvesting, the seed loss were measured in three amounts of seed planting rates (5, 10, and 12 kg/ha) and three ground speeds of the combine harvester (1.5, 2 and 2.5 km/h). The average seed loss in the combine was 4.83%, of which more than 94% was related to the combine header. The findings showed that with the increase in plant density, seed loss in combine is greatly reduced. The average labor in traditional harvesting was 315 labor-hours, which was 98 times more than in the mechanized method. The average cost of harvesting in traditional and mechanized methods was calculated as 49.4 and 2.7 million rials/hectare in 2019, respectively. The input energy in traditional and mechanized harvesting was 2088 and 1510 MJ/ha, respectively, that in the traditional method, human energy was the major part of the input energy. The results showed that the use of non-dehiscence cultivars and mechanized harvesting allows the development of sesame cultivation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Energy
  • Manual harvesting
  • Economic analysis
  • Combine losses
  • Non-dehiscence Sesame
Amiri, H., Asakereh, A., and Soleymani, M. (2022). Economic analysis and evaluation of grain losses of two common straw collecting combine harvester: a case study, Azna county, Lorestan, Iran. Journal of Agricultural Machinery. 12(4): 575-588. (In Persian).
Anonymous. (2019). Agricultural Statistical Yearbook. Tehran: Iran Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad. (In Persian). 
Dahab, M. H., and Mohamed, E. I. (2007). Effect of partially mechanical and manual harvesting and sowing method on yield losses of sesame in eastern Sudan. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 15(1): 84-100.
Delibaltova, V., and Dallev, M. (2017). Comparative testing of oil sunflower hybrids in the region of north east Bulgaria. Scientific Papers. Series A. Agronomy. 60: 225-228.
Georgiev, S., Stamatov, S., and Deshev, M. (2009). Requirements to sesame (Sesamum Indicum L.) cultivars breeding for mechanized harvesting. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 15:26–30.
Gheleshkhani, A. (2017). Wheat harvesting performance of the straw mounting compare with a usual type. Biomedical Engineering. 6 (3): 1-9. (In Persian).
Ghorbani, R., Mondani, F., Amirmoradi, S., Feizi, H., Khorramdel, S., Teimouri, M., Sanjani, S., Anvarkhah, S., and Aghel, H. (2011). A case study of energy use and economical analysis of irrigated and dryland wheat production systems. Applied Energy. 88(1): 283-288.
Helali, A. (2018). Investigating the share of domestically produced and imported oilseeds in the supply of household oil. Institute for Planning, Agricultural Economics and Rural Development Research, Iran Ministry of Agriculture- Jahad. (In Persian).
Ishpekov, S., Petrov, P., A. Triffonov., and Kolev, B. (2015). Technologies for mechanized harvesting of sesame in Bulgaria. Mechanization in Agriculture and Conserving of the Resources. 61(4): 13-15.
KhakRangin, R., Shamsi, H., Ranji, A., and PourAli, M. (2014). Determinat of agricultural parameters influencing design and production of sesame harvesting combine. The 8th National Congress of Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian).
Khalid, E. K., Babiker, E. B., and Tinay, A. H. (2003). Solubility and functional properties of sesame seed proteins as influenced by pH and/or salt concentration. Food Chemistry. 82(3): 361-366.
Kitani, O. (1999). CIGR handbook of agricultural engineering. Vol, V, Energy and Biomass Engineering. ASAE publication, ST Joseph, MI.
Langham, D. R. (2014). Method for mechanical harvesting of improved non-dehiscent sesame. United States Patent No. 8,656,692.
Naydenov, N., Ishpekov, S., and Zaykov, R. (2016). Opportunities for mechanical feeding of sesame plants in harvesting machine. Proceedings of University of Ruse. 55: 27-33.‏
Rahmati, M. H., Razdari, A. M.., Izadi, M., and Yoosefian, S. H. (2014). Evaluation and comparison of wheat harvest losses for two common combines in Khorramabad Township. Journal of Researches in Mechanics of Agricultural Machinery: 3(4): 1-8. (In Persian).
Roa, V. P., Raikhelkarv V. D., and Sondge, S. (2000). Evaluation of penman radiation and evaporation methods for predicting sesame evapotranspiration. Journal of research APAU. 18:131-134.
Rostami, S., Lotfalian, M., and Hoseinzadeh-Samani, B. (2018). Hoseinzadeh-Samani. Assessment and Comparison of Conventional and Straw Walker Combines Harvesting Losses in Fars Province. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research. 19(70): 85-96. (In Persian).
Salehi, M., and Saeidi, G. (2013). Selection Indices fo Seed Yield Improvement in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 10(4): 667-673. (In Persian).
Stamatov, S., Velcheva, N., and Deshev, M. (2018). Introduced sesame accessions as donors of useful qualities for breeding of mechanized harvesting cultivars. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 24:820–824.
Stamatov. S., and Deshev, M. (2014). Selection approaches for the sesame forms suitable for mechanized harvesting. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 20:1435–1438.